HomeMy WebLinkAboutOPE Archive - 08/03/2016 - ORR # 10432 Lockwood TextsOmg
Don't know what to say
Say
~fwfl6]gitfi·~·,.,itt 1~·:-g•µY-\~
!>yvhite .-shirt stanq.i_ng-~ at; }~
>the corner towards .1
:7:: restroom? ·.,
. You've
talked to him. Letter to
Ed praising veto. Usually
wears a suit
That's what I thought. He
seems really uptight
Record she didn't take a
run at you
I think she is starting to
like me
.... uu1a
~·: · in -s e· 1s ·s ar:. mg1 o 71-"
!' like me · ·;: . ' . ' . '
JThey have, to rea·l·i;~I~~"~
not trying cut them short
but after so many of the
same comments folks
start tuning them out
Wow she was good!
Good job.-has
very bad breath. Telling
me I'm a liar.
· . almost decked me!
I did not lie.
This is a slam
dunk NO!!
Yikes!
b/21 /HJ 1.Cl Al/-
But the
+
No Text
Dang ... 4-2 ...
who'dathunk!!
I UUI
•
I 'U'I I I
is running 10 to 1 against
ebenezer. I urge you to
say that explicitly and
challenge others to
dispute that. I would
think 90% or more of
emails go to all of you.
think you can't go wrong
siding with citizens and
publicly and
unequivocally doing so.
We really need you to be
clear and strong on this
issue.
Thurman told me she is
against it and was
actually fairly convincing
in her reasoning
But I understand the city
attorney has recused her
So now folks do not have
to be here to turn n there
own cards?
Visibility is critical. Lusk
is failing to mention high
density housing. 1/4 acre
lots are not rural. Period.
The CLU P said to
consider a CSO, not
approve them.
But then the land is not
part of the density
calculation. Wow!
Conflict of interest.
,-.... -·-- - - ---~ --• ----- - -.L ~ -·--
LJ\..,\.Ullv
I lit: L;UlfllllUlllLY lid::>
never seen this at all?
This is ridiculous.
It would need to be a
completely different
rezoning.
We should not approve a
plan that the developer
says he will not do.
Why isn't the developer
being asked t sit down.
Applicants need to sit
down .
Karen is recused and
cannot say anything.
This is effectively a
I 111:::, 1:::, I IUll;UIUU::,.
It would need to be a
completely different
rezoning.
We should not approve a
plan that the developer
says he will not do.
Why isn't the developer
being asked t sit down.
Applicants need to sit
down.
Karen is recused and
cannot say anything.
This is effectively a
denial.
Some serious questions
this just unveiled; wow!
Once they significantly
change this it is no
longer what the citizens
saw. I cry foul! Ken
Jarrard should not allow
Pete Hendrick's to drive
this. Shamefu I.
But citizens would not
know what is being
considered. This needs
to be denied.
Negotiating on the fly is
not fair to the citizens or
the process.
The community has
The 35 acres conserved
is a farce
Won't be that amount
due to septic
Trees will be removed
Ok
They think the land won't
be touched but it won•t
Effluent kills trees the
expert told me it does
even treated effluent
I have an expert geo
technology expert for the
city to talk to if you are
interested referred to me
h\I l=rl r!lrtor \Mhn I
l-'\,., LUii..:>
LU Uc; \..ll;;"CILl;JU IL VVlll llUl
remain Undisturbed as
pitched to the city
Btw the new high school
drove a lot of the new
developement out here
in my opinion not AG1
If you build it they will
come!
· It's all the people that
have kids that moved
here's fault
Because of new
school
No , new kids need new
schools
by Ed Carter who I
mentioned
The conservationists are
being mislead as to
amount of conserved
space cannot be
determined until septic
engineer designs the
plan
this plan will
environmentally impact
and sacrifice the areas
everyone is talking about
as Undisturbed land and
wetlands etc etc since
the lines must be buried
and trees have to be
removed and zones have
to be created it will not
remain Undisturbed as
oitched to the citv
He did not deny anything
I stated
Clup considered
community septic??? No
Can we vote
Too much Drama and
imposing fear
To much texting to me
from you!
Thank you SO much!!!!!!!!
Sorry for texting so much
I was really really tired!
Thank you again and the
other council members
too! I will let them know.