HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - CC - 04/18/2012Milton Charter commission
Agenda summary/minutes
April 18, 2012
1. Meeting called to order at 6:10 p.m. with a quorum recognized. Following members were
present: George Ragsdale, David Shannon, Robert Myers, Gordon Hunter and Ron Wallace.
Also in attendance were City Manager Chris Lagerbloom, Administrative Assistance Christine
Doss, and City Attorney (Secretary) Ken Jarrard.
2. Announcements/Miscellaneous – Chairman stated that work of the Charter Commissioner was
wrapping up. Discussion ensued regarding final issues for wrap up.
3. Approve April 11 minutes – a motion by George Ragsdale and second by David Shannon to
approve the April 11 minutes, with a clarification to replace “council” with the word
“commission” in two places. Motion approved 5-0.
4. Approve agenda – a motion by George Ragsdale and second by David Shannon to approve the
agenda. Motion approved 5-0.
5. Charter issues
Processing and Printing of Ordinances after adoption.
a. Printing of Ordinances after adoption, section 3.16(b) – City Manager discussed the
process for how approved ordinances are handled. A handout regarding this process
was circulated. Present version of the charter provides: “After adoption of any
ordinance, the clerk shall, as soon as possible, distribute a copy of the mayor and to
each councilmember and shall file a reasonable number of copies in the office of the
clerk at such other public places as the city council may designate.”
b. Also implicated are 3.19(b) and 3.20(c).
c. Discussion ensued regarding having the City attorney draft language consistent with
what the Charter currently provides.
Motion by George Ragsdale and David Shannon to move forward with City Attorney to
prepare proposed modification to section 3.16(b), 3.19(b) and 3.20(c) of the charter
consistent with the bullet points handed out by the city manager. Motion approved 4-0
with Hunter absent.
Charter Housekeeping
A member walked the commission through housekeeping tweaks that are generally non-
substantive, but are items it was believed should be changed in order to ensure the Charter is
current and up to date. The following sections were reviewed for possible housekeeping
modifications:
• Page 8, section 1.2(b)(40), changing election to “referendum;”
• Page 10, section 2.10(b) regarding “contained in this subsection;”
• Page 10, section 2.10(c)(3) – a discussion ensued regarding whether this may need to
be changed in the event that a change is made to term limit language;
• Page 11, section 2.11(b), (c), and (d), regarding consolidation of districts;
• Page 12, section 2.11(f), regarding special election language with no further application,
plus a recommendation to remove “beginning in 2007” in section (f).
• Page 16, section 3.10(c), with a proposal to delete “and the executive aide to the
mayor;”
• Page 17, section 3.11(a), a discussion ensued regarding whether a change would be
appropriate to ensure there is no lag between a new council term, and the date by
which those members are sworn in;
• Page 21, section 3.19(b), a recommendation that this provision be made to conform to
potential changes regarding how adopted ordinance are processed;
• Page 23, section 3.22(b)(3), “have the power to administer and execute affidavits;”
• Page 27, section 3.29, provide that the mayor pro tempore for a 2 year term;
• Page 30, section 4.12, require the city attorney to have no less than 7 years of active
practice in law;
• Page 34, section 6.11(b), change “election” to “referendum;”
• Page 38, section 6.28(a), strike reference to 3.17;
• Pages 47-51, sections 7.13 through 7.16, strike all as no longer pertinent;
• Page 52, section 7.17, strike as no longer pertinent;
• Page 61, Appendix B, reference was made to the “Redistricting Plan Components” and
specifically changing the districts from 6 to 3. A reference was also made to changing
the census date on page 62, but it was generally agreed that this was a better change
for legislative counsel to make.
Subject to the few exceptions noted above, these modifications are identified in a Charter
handout that had been assembled and presented by a commission member. The commission
was going to consider further the above proposals and action would be taken on formal
recommendations at the next Charter Commission meeting.
Defined Benefit Plan
A member handed out correspondence regarding possibly removing the defined benefit
component of their employment benefit plan. Discussion ensued but the general consensus
was that no action be taken on defined benefits within the Charter.
Term Limits
A discussion ensued regarding possible options for term limits. Section 2.10(c) is the pertinent
section of the Milton Charter. Another member raised the issue that the commission might be
considering the current makeup of the council as opposed to thinking about the issue at a more
general level. The consensus appeared to be that a majority of the commission was in favor of
recommending some sort of term limits.
A handout was circulated that contained proposed language.
• The discussion was divided that the mayor should have a limit on the number of terms
as mayor, but there should be no prohibition on a former mayor running for council.
Consensus was council service should be treated the same. That after serving a set
number of terms in council, there should be no prohibition on running for mayor.
A motion was made by George Ragsdale and second by Gordon Hunter to strike section
2.10(c) in its entirety, and replace with the following:
1. The mayor shall be limited to serving two consecutive four-year terms of office. After
serving two consecutive full terms of office, the mayor must take a break in service of at
least one year following the expiration of the term before becoming eligible for election to
the office of city council.
2. Councilmembers shall be limited to serving two consecutive four-year terms of office.
3. Councilmembers may run for the office of mayor at any time.
4. There is no lifetime limit on the number of years a city council member, including the
mayor, can serve.
5. For the purposes of this section and in computing term limits: (i) a councilmember, who
resigns or vacates office prior to the expiration of the term for which such person is elected,
shall be deemed to have served a full term; (ii) a person elected to fill a vacancy on the
council for an unexpired term shall be deemed to have served a full term if fifty percent or
more of such term is remaining at the time of such election.
Motion approved 5-0.
Next meeting is May 2.
At the next meeting, it was proposed that the Charter Commission receive assembled books
which will include all proposed changes (in redline) to include the recommendations regarding
districts and language regarding unincorporated islands.
Motion by George Ragsdale and seconded by David Shannon to adjourn. Motion approved 5-
0. Meeting adjourned at 9 p.m.
Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: 0.5"