Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - CC - 08/03/2020 Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 1 of 46 Page 1 of 46 1 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Lockwood: I want to welcome everybody here tonight and I would like to call the regular meeting for the Milton City Council for Monday, August 3, 2020, to order. The city strongly recommends that you review tonight’s agenda carefully, and if you wish to speak on any item on the agenda, please bring your comment card to the clerk as soon as possible, which Tammy is sitting here to my right. While the Milton rules allow a speaker to turn in their comment card up until the clerk calls that agenda item, once the agenda item is called, no more comment cards will be accepted. So, I am going to ask our clerk to please call the roll and make general announcements. Tammy: Good evening, Mayor and Council, I will be happy to call roll for the August 3rd, 2020 regular meeting. I would like to remind those in attendance to please silence all cell phones at this time. Those attending the meetings who would like to make a public comment, you are required to complete a public comment card prior to speaking on the item. Your comment card must be presented to the city clerk prior to the agenda item being called. All speakers, please identify yourself by name, address, and organization before beginning your comment. If you are representing an organization, an affidavit is required stating you have the authority to speak on behalf of that organization. Please review tonight’s agenda, and if you would like to make a comment, please bring your comment card to me now. Demonstration of any sort within the chamber is prohibited. Please refrain from any applause, cheering, booing, outbursts, or dialog with any person speaking. Anyone in violation will be asked to leave. As I call roll for this evening, please confirm your attendance. Mayor Joe Lockwood? Mayor Lockwood: Here. Tammy: Councilmember Peyton Jamison? CM Jamison: Here. Tammy: Councilmember Paul Moore? CM Moore: Here. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 2 of 46 Page 2 of 46 2 Tammy: Councilmember Laura Bentley? CM Bentley: Here. Tammy: Councilmember Carol Cookerly? CM Cookerly: Here. Tammy: Councilmember Joe Longoria? CM Longoria: Here. Tammy: Councilmember Rick Mohrig? CM Mohrig: Here. Councilmembers Present: Mayor Joe Lockwood, Councilmember Peyton Jamison, Councilmember Paul Moore, Councilmember Laura Bentley, Councilmember Carol Cookerly, Councilmember Joe Longoria and Councilmember Rick Mohrig. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Led by Mayor Joe Lockwood) Mayor Lockwood: Would everyone please rise for the pledge of allegiance? Several: I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which is stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Mayor Lockwood: And again, I want to welcome everybody here tonight and I appreciate everybody working with us on our social distancing standards and, it’s really easy to pack a room when our seats are all spread out like that, so – but I appreciate everybody’s help on that. I’m gonna go ahead and ask Tammy to please sound the next item. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Tammy: The next item is approval of a meeting agenda, agenda item number 20-203. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 3 of 46 Page 3 of 46 3 Mayor Lockwood: Okay, I think staff would like to add, amend the agenda to add a resolution of the City of Milton authorize and participation in the Apple Developer Program and acceptance of contracts associated with this program to new business tonight. Is there anything else on the agenda anyone would like to add? Okay, hearing none, I will open up for a motion. CM Bentley: Mayor, I would like to make a motion to approve the agenda as amended. CM Moore: Second. Mayor Lockwood: All right, I have a motion for approval from Councilmember Bentley with a second from Councilmember Moore. All in favor, please say aye. Several: Aye. Mayor Lockwood: Any opposed? That’s unanimous. Okay, Tammy, moving on to public comment. Do we have any general public comment? Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bentley moved to approve the meeting agenda with the following changes: add a Resolution of the City of Milton to authorize and participate in the Apple Developer Program and acceptance of contracts associated with this program to New Business tonight Councilmember Moore seconded the motion. The motion passed (7-0). PUBLIC COMMENT Tammy: I do not have any public – general public. I have some for later in the agenda. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, thank you. I will go ahead and read the rules on public comment whether it is general or not. Public comment is the time for citizens to share information with the mayor and city council and to provide input and opinions on any matter that if it is a general contact that is not scheduled, but during the scheduled hearing for items on our agenda, it will be specific for that. Each citizen who chooses to participate in public comment must complete a comment card on the table and submit it to our city clerk down to Councilmember Jamison’s right before that agenda Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 4 of 46 Page 4 of 46 4 item is called. Please remember, it is not a time to engage the mayor or members of council in conversation, and when your name is called, please come forward and speak into the microphone stating your name and address for the record. You’ll have five minutes for remarks. The city encourages you right now to review the agenda and if you wish to speak, bring your comment card to the clerk before that item. We will move on now to the consent agenda. Tammy, if you would please sound those items. CONSENT AGENDA Tammy: The first item is approval of the June 15th, 2020 regular city council meeting minutes, agenda item number 20-204. The next item is approval of the financial statements and investment report for the period ending June 2020, agenda item number 20-205. The third item is approval of a task order between the City of Milton and B, M, & K, PC for asphalt reconstruction and resurfacing project, agenda item number 20-206. Our fourth item is approval of a change – the approval of change order number four to the professional services agreement between the City of Milton and InterDev, LLC, to decrease VCIO/Project Manager Hours, increase technical support, and to account for annual escalator, agenda item number 20-207. The next item is approval of change order number one to the goods and services purchase agreement between the City of Milton and Utility Associates Inc. for interview room cameras in the new public safety complex, agenda item number 20-208. Our sixth item is approval of a Milton and Berry, Dunn, McNeil, & Parker LLC, for strategic planning services, agenda item number 20-209. Our next item is approval of a change order to construction management at-risk agreement between the City of Milton and New South Construction Company LLC for the new public safety complex project. Our next item is approval of an additional boarding documents for Invoice Cloud, Inc, merchant account, agenda item number 20-211. Our ninth and final consent agenda item is the approval of a plat revision. It’s the commercial – the name of the development is the Commercial Parcel at Lakeside at Crabapple, LL number 1134, 860 and 870 Mayfield Road. It is a minor plat subdivided from 870 Mayfield Road into one lot. 0.742 was the total acres and the Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 5 of 46 Page 5 of 46 5 density is one commercial lot. Agenda item number 20-212. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, do I have a motion on the consent agenda? CM Longoria: Mayor, I move that we approve the consent agenda as read. CM Cookerly: Second. Male Speaker: Second. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, I have a motion for approval from Councilmember Longoria with a second from Councilmember Cookerly. All in favor, please say aye. Several: Aye. Mayor Lockwood: Any opposed? That’s unanimous. Okay, tonight we don’t have any items under reports and presentations, so we’ll move on to first presentation. Tammy if you’ll please sound those items? Motion and Vote: Councilmember Longoria moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Cookerly seconded the motion. The motion passed (7-0). REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS (None) FIRST PRESENTATION Tammy: The first item is consideration of an ordinance of the Mayor and Council of the City of Milton, Georgia, to establish the ad valorem tax rate of the City of Milton for fiscal year 2021; and for other purposes, item number 20-213. The Finance Director, Ms. Bernadette Harvill. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, do I have a motion on the first presentation? CM Longoria: Mayor, I move that we approve the first presentation. CM Mohrig: Second. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 6 of 46 Page 6 of 46 6 Mayor Lockwood: Okay, I have a motion for approval from Councilmember Longoria with a second from Councilmember Mohrig. All in favor, please say aye. Several: Aye. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Longoria moved to approve the First Presentation items. Councilmember Mohrig seconded the motion. The motion passed (7-0). PUBLIC HEARING (None) ZONING AGENDA Mayor Lockwood: That’s unanimous. Okay, we have no items under public hearing, so we’ll move on to our zoning agenda. If our city clerk would please sound the first zoning agenda item and before I ask you to do that, in discussion with Ken, my – this item that is coming up before us, my day job and my personal company has been asked to help on the construction of that project, so I am going to recuse myself of any input or decision on this tonight, so Councilmember Jamison is Mayor Pro Tempore, has the – will preside over this item. CM Jamison: All right, thank you. Tammy: Mayor Pro Tempore, we do have a public comment on this item. CM Jamison: Okay. Tammy: Do we want to do that first? Male Speaker: We sound the item first. Tammy: I’m sorry. I’m sorry, I’m just making [inaudible] [00:10:20]. Male Speaker: Okay. Tammy: The first item is consideration of U20-01/CV20-01 located at 12900 Arnold Mill Road by Ebenezer United Methodist Church to request a use permit, section 64-1804, to construct a 23,000 square Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 7 of 46 Page 7 of 46 7 foot activity center on the existing church property of 5088 square feet for a total of 26 – 28,088 square feet on 6.6.1 acres. To request a two-part concurrent variance to, number one, allow parking in front of a building, section 64-1143, and two, to reduce the required parking, section 64-1410. Agenda item number 20-198. Mr. Parag Agrawal. Robyn: So, I’ll let – oh, thank you. Good evening, Mayor and City Council. Thank you for this opportunity to present to you this request for a use permit to expand a church use. They’re requesting a 23,000 square foot structure for event, not event facility but for a facility for on-site use. And they’re also asking for a two-part concurrent variance. The applicant is Ebenezer United Methodist Church. The last permit issued in 1993 by Fulton County approved and addition for a total of 5000 square feet on 4.14 acres. Since that time, and additional 2.47 acres has been acquired. Therefore, the need for the updated use permit for the expansion of the acreage as well as the requested 23,000 square feet for activity center. It is obviously currently zoned AG1. The initial site plan submitted has required two additional concurrent variances. This was back in January/February based on the location adjacent to residential use on the northern portion of the property. The church and city staff met and a revised site plan was submitted to move the activity center to comply with setbacks and buffers which are a 75-foot buffer and 10-foot improvement setback as well as a 75- foot setback when adjacent to a residential use. So, you all are familiar with that area. The Georgia Golf Driving Range comes around to the north and we found out that there was a residential use still being used for residence. So, therefore, we needed to ask for the additional two concurrent variances. But then, we met with the church and their architect and were able to relocate it, turn it 90 degrees, the activity center based in part because of a large oak that was determined to be not viable. And that was approved by our city arborist as well to be removed because of possible hazard. So, that allowed the opportunity for the activity center to be turned and to be able to comply with two or the originally asked variances. Right here, we have the location map. Everybody familiar with it at the northwest intersection of Cox and Arnold Mill Road. Zoning map, as you can see, the light beige is AG1. The orangey- peachy color is City of Roswell. So. This is the revised site plan Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 8 of 46 Page 8 of 46 8 that you have before you that turns the building the 90 degrees from what it was away from the northern property line as well as adding a proposed pavilion. And there’ll be some pictures later on in the presentation. You can see that they are providing the 75-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback to the west. There’s a single-family residence between this property and the golf center. And then as it continues around to the north, it provides the required buffer. Again, they’re asking for the 23,000 square foot activity center and a pavilion, 144 parking spaces. And the parking spaces include the existing parking spaces right at the corner of Cox and Arnold Mill, as well as some parking in the middle southern part and the western part. So. So, this, the applicant and their architect has worked closely with our city architect on the elevations as well as understanding this is not set in stone. There would probably need to be some more additional work to it, but as I state in this slide, everything would have to be approved by the design review board before the building permit would be issued. So. Okay. Again, this is an example of the proposed pavilion. Many of you will see as familiar. I believe it is from the Birmingham United Methodist Church, so obviously, it won’t be an exact replica, but it just gives an idea of what they want to try to propose and to build on the property. Just going through the different various public participation meetings, we had the CZI meeting on December 17th. Six community members were present. There were some property owners in attendance from Etris Walk, which is located in Roswell to the south across Cox Road. Their concern was with lighting and possible additional traffic. There is also a large concern, there’s an intersection at Etris and Cox at Ebenezer. It is a very difficult situation, intersection. But I believe that right of way and intersection is responsibility of the City of Roswell. Then the owner/operator of Georgia Golf Center at the time came and told us about the residence on the northern part of the property as well as I just said about the congestion at Cox and Arnold Mill as well as Cox and Etris. So. Based upon that previous meeting, we added two concurrent variances because of the residence, the residence on the northern portion. And we had the meeting at the end of January. No one attended from the community. So, go on. The Design Review Board met on February 4th and the Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 9 of 46 Page 9 of 46 9 following comments were made. Support the use permit. Need to work on architecture of approved and would like to see the paint color if approved. And obviously, that would be part of their package is the color scheme and the different material. We always do a material board, colors, the whole nine yards. And they supported the request to reduce the parking. Again, the public participation report, this is a meeting that is required that the applicant host and provide. And they had two public meetings, one on December 16th and February 17th at the church. Again, the first meeting, there were four attendees. Issues including parking lot lighting and traffic in that intersection of Cox and Arnold Mill Roads. At the Planning Commission June 24th, whoops, time travel. So, as you all know, we weren’t able to meet during the COVID time for planning commission or city council. So, the first time it went to planning commission was on June 24th. And they unanimously recommended the approval of U20-02, and VC20-01, parts 1 and 4. Those are two concurrent variances and we’ll talk about them a little more detail. They also made a recommendation to add hours for delivery Sunday through Saturday, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. They were thinking that if there was a wedding that was occurring or a different occasion that might need some deliveries at some odd, earlier times and during the weekend, so that’s why they recommended that additional condition. Go ahead. And every time we look at a use permit, there is a certain – there’s a set of considerations that are required for us to contemplate. And so, the first one is the existing church is within the AEE land use category on the City of Milton Comprehensive Plan Update Map. And a church or a place of worship is an allowed use if a use permit is approved by the mayor and city council. Therefore, it is consistent with the current comprehensive land use plan. And when we look at compatibility with land uses and zoning in the vicinity, as you know, to the north and northwest is the driving range which is approved through a use permit in Fulton County in 1989. There’s scattered single-family residences on various size parcels to the north and northeast. The southwest is the Ebenezer Cemetery just south of the new City of Milton Soccer Complex which is across the street. And that also originally had a use permit for recreation fields that were approved in Fulton County as well as there was a zoning modification approximately 7 or 8 years ago, Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 10 of 46 Page 10 of 46 10 but now is our facility. To the south/southwest is the Etris Walk subdivision within the City of Roswell. I just want to let you know, we reached out to the City of Roswell and they did not have any issues or ask for any additional conditions or anything like that. And then further to the west is Union Primitive Baptist Church. We recently did an expansion – not we, but they had requested expansion of the church in 2011. And then single-family residences to the west. Okay? and the proposed use currently violates regulations governing land development, but if the requested use permit is approved by you all, the it would no longer be in violation of any type of governing regulations. Number four, there will be minimal effect by the church and associated activity center on traffic flow, vehicular and pedestrian along Arnold Mill Road. And number five – location and number of parking spaces. So, there are existing parking in front of existing building and proposed parking along Cox Road in front of the proposed building as well as a little bit further to the west. Staff is recommending approval of the concurrent variance for location based on the fact that a 15-foot landscape strip planted to buffer standards can be planted along Cox Road to help conceal the parking. The use permit requires 220 spaces based on one space per 35 square feet in the largest assembly area. The applicant has requested to reduce it to 144 of which 17 exist already. Staff is recommending approval of this concurrent variance to reduce the number of parking spaces. Number six – location of open space. The site is 6.61 acres and there is a stream located on the northwestern portion and the required 75-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback along with the other buffers and to the north as well. So, therefore, it does have a fair amount of open space. Number seven, protective screening. Again, as I just mentioned, it does meet the required 75-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback adjacent to AG1 and again, as mentioned, the 15-foot landscape strip planted to buffer standards along Cox and a 10-foot landscape on the other frontage which would be Arnold Mill. Number eight, hours and manner of operation. The applicant, we asked them to submit kind of an outline of their different activities that they see happening both in the church as well as the activity center. And based upon that report, we recommended hours of operation, Monday through Saturday, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sundays, 8:00 a.m. to 9:30. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 11 of 46 Page 11 of 46 11 And as I previously mentioned, the Planning Commissions recommended deliveries Sunday through Saturday, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. And in regards to outdoor lighting, the applicant has not indicated any additional lighting on the site. If lighting is proposed, it must comply with the night sky ordinance. Ingress and egress to the property, the site plan indicates there are three curb cuts along Cox. The applicant has stated that the curb cut closest to the intersection of Cox and Arnold Mill Road will be eliminated. And the site plan meets all the development standards for the church use permit, so that is under section 64-1804, so I didn’t go into detail on that because they did meet those regulations. And based on all those items, staff recommends approval conditional view 20-01 for the church and associated activity center. Next. So, now, we’re going to look at the site plan analysis and categories, the two variance requests, and the two items – parking and the rural Milton overlay. And as you all are familiar, there are four considerations that are required to take into consideration when reviewing and recommending a variance. So, you can keep on going. Okay. So, each of those four were considered and staff recommends approval conditional to reduce the number of parking spaces from 220 to 144. And then Part 4, to allow parking in front of the building, which it only exists in front of the original sanctuary building. And based on the limited area to place required parking and the applicant will be installing a 15-foot landscape strip planted to buffer standard, staff recommends approval condition of this request. And in conclusion, if approved with the recommended conditions, the proposed church and associated activity center is consistent with the City of Milton Land Use Plan Update, therefore, staff recommends U20-01 be approved conditional. Additional, staff recommends VC20-01, Parts 1 and 4 be approved conditional. And I’ll just step through the recommended conditions. 1A is assembly building with a maximum of 5888 square feet and a 23,000 square foot activity center for a total of 28088 square feet located on 6.61 acres. Also included in there is the accessory structures to include a pavilion with outdoor fireplace. And then everything is based upon the revised site plans submitted on March 16th whereby the exact layout of the project may contain minor deviations approved by the director, but in general, that this – any, when they submit their land Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 12 of 46 Page 12 of 46 12 disturbance permit, if you decide to approve this, it would be consistent with the site plan. Okay. And again, we included the hours of operation in the conditions, Monday through Saturday, 8:00-10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 9:30. And deliveries Sunday through Saturday, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Three. So, the owner’s agreement to the following considerations, to construct new parking areas with porous grass pavers or crushed gravel on the southwest parking areas. So, if you look at the site plan, we are not speaking of obviously the existing parking that is near the corner or apex of the two roads. We’re not speaking of the new parking that is kind of in the middle, but it truly is the southwest corner near the detention that they intend to do the pervious type pavement. And also, number four, to agree to dedication improvements, basically saying that the public, be subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and GDOT prior to the issuance of land disturbance permit. Entrances and frontage improvement shall conform to chapter 48, streets, sidewalks, and other places. And number five, well, continuing number four. Be, if at such time the Director of Public Works determines that the traffic generated by the activity center site impacts the operation of Cox Road and/or State Route 140, he or she may require the owner to conduct a traffic study to determine if the activity center warrants any additional improvements at no cost to the city. If improvements are determined to be warranted, owner shall install those at no cost to the city. Number five, just our general condition in regard to stormwater management. And I believe that is – oh. Also, just want to let you know, based on the city attorney’s recommendation that when you go to vote, if you decide to approve this item, that you would do one motion for the use permit and then a second for the recommended concurrent variance because we have separated it out from the actual ordinance for the approval of conditions. So, that being because the variances can expire after I believe it is 36 months. Therefore, if they didn’t build it for another five years, they would have to come back and request those variances separately to the Board of Zoning Appeals. And I’m here to answer any questions. And the applicant is here, representative of the church as well as their architect. CM Jamison: Any questions for staff before public comment? Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 13 of 46 Page 13 of 46 13 Male Speaker: Just a couple. Robyn, in the CZIM meeting, you suggested there was a discussion from the surrounding neighborhood about the lighting of the parking lot. Has that been resolved to the satisfaction of the homeowners? Robyn: We have not heard from them since that point. I pointed out that we are required to meet the night sky ordinance and it is fairly restrictive. It is one-foot candle at their property line. And it has to be shielded and also, the church had indicated that they weren’t planning on doing additional lighting, but again, if they do, they have to comply with the night sky ordinance. Male Speaker: So, no additional lighting like in the new soft surface parking or the pervious surface parking area there wouldn’t be anything? Robyn: It appears not at this point, yeah. Male Speaker: Okay. And my other question was one of the last comments you made was with regard to the timeline. Do we know what he church’s timeline is to, intention to –? Robyn: Uh, you’ll have to speak to them about that. Yeah. Interviewer: Thank you. That’s all I had for now. CM Jamison: Any other questions? Okay. Tammy, if you will call. Tammy: Thank you. I’d like to call Mr. Reggie Elkins to come to the podium. He’s just going to clean it really fast for you. Reggie: Reggie Elkins with R&Z Concepts. I’m the architect for the church and would like to initially thank the staff for working with us so closely. Male Speaker: Excuse me, sir. Sorry. Can you speak your address also for the record? Reggie: Sorry, 4621 Village H Drive Northeast, Marietta, Georgia. Mayor Lockwood: Thank you. Got it? Male Speaker: Yep. Reggie: So, the church was built in 1853 and at that time, as many of you Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 14 of 46 Page 14 of 46 14 know, Milton was a horse farm and farming community. And really, the goal of the church from the very beginning was to keep that character with this activity center. And that’s why we designed a barn look similar to Scottsdale Farms. And to try to keep that character within the community. And the real purpose of the activity center is not only for the membership but also for the community for the weddings and retreats and that type of thing for the members as well as the community use. Again, on behalf of the church, we hope that you see fit to allow these use permits so that we can continue through the process and hopefully, build an activity center that’s worthwhile for not only the church, but for the community. And I believe you had a question that Robyn couldn’t answer. Male Speaker: Was that timeline? Male Speaker: Building timeline. Reggie: Yeah, we’ve actually been working on contract documents through this process and we’re hoping to be under construction within the next two to three months if approved. Male Speaker: For the entire project, no phased. It will be one. Reggie: Correct. Male Speaker: Oh, wonderful. Thank you. Reggie: Any other questions? Female Speaker: I have a comment. Reggie: Sure. Female Speaker: I’m happy to see a church grow. Congratulations. Reggie: Well, thank you. I’ll have to tell you, the very first meeting we had with the staff, you know, any time you come in with a church activity center, the first thing that comes to mind is a pre- engineered building. And so, all of the staff was sitting there. Here’s another pre-engineered building. When they heard the concept that the church wanted, they got real excited about the project and have been very beneficial in helping us through the Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 15 of 46 Page 15 of 46 15 project, so we appreciate that. Female Speaker: Good for you. Good for you. Male Speaker: Any others? Male Speaker: I think you made the comment that you had used Scottsdale Farm as a design standard for the general look and feel of the new building. Are you considering using similar construction materials as Scottsdale Farms as well? Reggie: Yes, um-hmm. Male Speaker: Terrific. Reggie: Yeah, interior will be exposed timbers construction. Male Speaker: Okay. CM Jamison: Laura? Laura: Just one other comment. Um, thank you so much for working with staff to shift the site a little bit so that we were able to withdraw the other variances. That is very much appreciated any time we have variances, we hear a lot from people, so thank you. Reggie: It created a few challenges, but it worked out real well. Laura: Thank you. CM Jamison: All right, any other questions or comments? All right, thank you. Ms. [inaudible] [00:36:15], any other public comment? Tammy: That’s all for this item, Mayor Pro Tempore. CM Jamison: So, we’ll close the public hearing and open up for a motion. I guess, Ken, we have to do separate motions, is that correct? Ken: We do. CM Jamison: Okay, so one for U20-01 and then one separately for VC-20-01? Ken: That’s correct. [Inaudible] [00:36:29]. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 16 of 46 Page 16 of 46 16 CM Jamison: Okay, so I will vote for a motion on U20-01. CM Moore: Mayor Pro Tempore, I make a motion that we approve 020 – I’m sorry, U20-01 as presented by staff and the community. CM Cookerly: Second. Female Speaker: Second. CM Jamison: Okay, I have a motion from Councilmember Moore and a second from Councilmember Cookerly. Is there any discussion on this? Okay. Male Speaker: So, I just want to be sure it’s with the recommendation – the recommended – Female Speaker: Conditions. Conditions. Male Speaker: Staff. CM Jamison: Staff recommendations? Male Speaker: Yeah. Male Speaker: I said as presented. As presented by staff. Male Speaker: Because we always get into this discussion about what we exactly approved, so I just wanted to make it clear. CM Jamison: Ken, was that motion – Ken: My position was that was inferred, assumed within the motion. CM Moore: I said as presented by staff. Male Speaker: Yeah, exactly. CM Jamison: Okay, good. Okay. Any discussion? All in favor, please say aye. Several: Aye. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 17 of 46 Page 17 of 46 17 Motion and Vote: Councilmember Moore moved to approve Agenda Item No. 20-198 with staff recommendations. Councilmember Cookerly seconded the motion. The motion passed (6-0). Mayor Joe Lockwood recused himself from the vote. CM Jamison: Opposed? Okay. That’s unanimous. We’ll vote for the second motion. Do we have a motion on VC20-01? CM Jamison: Mr. Mayor Pro Tempore, I move that we accept VC20-01 as presented by staff. Female Speaker: Second. CM Jamison: Okay, I have a motion from Councilmember Moore to approve VC-20-01, a second from CM Mohrig. Any discussion on the motion? All in favor, please say aye. Several: Aye. CM Jamison: Opposed? That’s unanimous. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Moore moved to approve Agenda Item No. 20-198 with staff recommendations. Councilmember Mohrig seconded the motion. The motion passed (6-0). Mayor Joe Lockwood recused himself from the vote. Mayor Lockwood: Thank you, CM Pro Tempore Jamison for filling in for me there. Will the City Clerk please sound the second and final zoning agenda item tonight? Tammy: The second item is consideration of ZM20-03 located at 13210 Bethany Road zoned R2, single-family residential by Big Sky Stables, LLC, Chris Hively requesting to modify condition 2 of RZ72-222 to reduce the front building setback from 150 feet to 100 feet from Bethany Road to conform to existing setbacks in this particular area of Bethany Road. Agenda item number 20-199. Ms. Robyn McDonald and Parag Agrawal. Robyn: Just one second. It is [inaudible] [00:39:25]. Well, hello again. It Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 18 of 46 Page 18 of 46 18 is a two-parter tonight, so I am happy to be able to present to you a zoning modification request, the current zoning is R2, single- family residential. Zoning case RZ72, that is 1972. And here’s a nice old folder. I want to show you all. Anyway. I’m not making this up. Basically, it’s a one-acre – the request is a one-acre parcel with a house under construction and a pending minor plat under review. This is the location. It’s on the lower part of Bethany Road kind of near Mayfield on the west side of Bethany. You’ll see the red square around it. It’s a one-acre parcel. And the request is to modify condition two of the 1972 zoning condition. And so that zoning condition at the time the Board of Commissioners made a condition to R2, so R2, if you are not familiar, is minimum one-acre lot. The front is typically 60 feet, sides are 15, and rear are 40. And we don’t really have a lot of R2 zoning. I think the Mayor has one across the street from his property on the north side of Doris, but I could probably count maybe on one hand how many we have in the city. In this situation, the Board of Commissioners made a condition to require that all structures be 150 feet away from Bethany Road. When, if you want to go ahead, and again, this is the zoning. The R2 is that orange-y ugly color. But you can see it is different from the AG1 and that’s where the zoning is, the R2. Go ahead. This is the site plan; Bethany Road is going in a north/south direction. Female Speaker: You can control it from here. Just press the screen. Robyn: Oh, the screen, okay? And so you can see this is an as-built of the foundation of the house and basically, when I started working on doing planned review of plats, and I looked at the plat and I pulled the condition and I realized that this house that was under construction under a legal lot of record that was part of a minor plat, that they also were in the midst of modifying, not this parcel, but some other parcels around it, that it was not 150 feet away from the property. Okay, I’m not good at this. Oh gosh. Okay, the history. The subject site again, I said, was AG1. I won’t go through all that. I talked about in 1972, the Board of Commissioners did rezone it. Again, I talked about the 150 feet from Bethany Road instead of the minimum required setback of 60 feet which is for R2. And I’m not doing a very good job. Oh, okay. As I mentioned, this was a part of a three-lot minor plat subdivision that was approved in early 2018 and later in 2018, they moved some property lines around, not this particular lot. Then Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 19 of 46 Page 19 of 46 19 again in 2019, the applicant submitted a third revision – or second revision to the same three lots and that’s at the time that it was discovered this requirement for the 150 feet. Then I just said that. Then on June 23rd, the applicant was present at the Community Zoning Information Meeting, held at Milton City Hall. This meeting was also held virtually via Zoom. There were no participants or attendees for this particular request. Again, I already went through what the R2 requirements were for setbacks. And staff knows that minor plots, three lots or less, do not require to provide a rural view shed, but the R2 zoning district is not very common within the city and that the condition from 1972 required that 150 feet is also very unique. Almost as though the commissioners predicted the need to preserve the rural view shed 40 years ahead of their time. Its staff’s opinion that this reduction of the front building setback is in keeping with the policy preserving the rural view shed along this corridor and the intent of the original zoning condition approved in 1972. So, staff recommends that condition two of RZ-71-222, 13210 Bethany Road be approved conditional as requested by the applicant, which is to reduce it from 150 feet to 100 feet, the front building setback line. So, and again, this – if you so choose to approve this zoning modification, this is what the condition would read and except for 13210 Bethany Road, which shall observe 100-foot setback from Bethany Road. So, with that, if you have any questions, I’d be happy to answer them, and the applicant is here as well, so – Mayor Lockwood: Okay, any questions for Robyn or staff on this? Okay. Do we have public comment on this? Tammy: We do, Mayor. We have two public comments on this. Mayor Lockwood: Okay. Tammy: Our first one will be with Mr. Scott Reese. Scott: Mr. Mayor, members of council, I am Scott Reese with Brumbelow Reese & Associates doing business at 13685 Highway 9, Milton, Georgia, 30004. I’m here tonight representing the Annie Fay Gardener Estate and I have provided the city with a letter that designates me as an agent for them. They are the property that is due south and west of the subject property. And the trustees are in Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 20 of 46 Page 20 of 46 20 full support of granting the variance for this property. Ms. Gardener is in a nursing home and unable to attend. So, that is the reason that I’m here representing them. So, just wanted to reiterate that the adjoining property owner to the south and west is in favor of the variance, thank you. Mayor Lockwood: Thank you sir. Tammy, you said we have another public comment? Tammy: We do. We have one more, Mayor. Our second and final public comment is Mr. Jayco Capers. Did I say that correctly? Oh, good. You have to correct me. Jacko: Good evening. My name is Jacko Capers. I am also an adjacent property owner. I guess that would make me to the north side of the property in question. I just want to state that I’m in support of the variance as well. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, thank you very much. No more public hearing - Tammy: That completes. Mayor Lockwood: No more public comments. So, that – I’ll close the public hearing part of this. And again, open back up. Is there any questions or comments from council on this to staff? Then I will open it up for a motion. CM Cookerly: All right. I’d be happy to do that. Mayor and Council, make a motion for agenda item 20 – do you want me to lead with that or is it ZM – Mayor Lockwood: The one with the Z. CM Cookerly: All right, ZM20-03 that we approve ZM dash – ZM20-03. CM Moore: Second. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, I have a motion Councilmember Cookerly for approval of this agenda item and a second from Councilmember Moore. Any discussion? Hearing none, all in favor please say aye? Group: Aye. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Cookerly moved to approve Agenda Item No. 20-199. Councilmember Moore seconded the Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 21 of 46 Page 21 of 46 21 motion. The motion passed (7-0). UNFINISHED BUSINESS Mayor Lockwood: That’s unanimous. Okay, thank you very much to staff and the applicant there. We’ll move onto unfinished business if the City Clerk will please sound that item. Tammy: The item is consideration to adopt the revised Milton Tree Canopy Conservation Ordinance and Tree Conservation Manual, agenda item number 20-157. Mr. Parag Agrawal. Parag: Mayor and City Councilmembers, I am Parag Agrawal, the city’s Community Development Director. And today, we are here to present to you the final draft of the tree conservation ordinance and the tree manual. I also have with me the City Arborist Sandra DeWitt. Sandra has served as the project manager of this very important project. As you know, the city staff has been working on this ordinance for a couple of years now. And the tree conservation ordinance is very important to preserve and enhance the unique character of the Milton community. The staff made a presentation in front of the – the staff made a presentation in front of the city council on June 15th. And at the June 15th city council meeting, we had a very good discussion and we got a very good feedback from the city council members. And based on the feedback received on the June 15th city council meeting, the staff has made four changes to the tree ordinance and to the tree manual. The goal of today’s presentation is not to go over the entire presentation again, but to focus on the four changes that have been made following the June 15th city council meeting. If the city council adopts the tree conservation ordinance today, the new ordinance will go into effect on December 1st, 2020. This will give around two or three months to the city staff to schedule some training workshops for the Milton community and for other stakeholders like landscaping companies. So, now, I will basically walk you through those four changes that we have made following the June 15th city council meeting. The first change which we have made is we have basically added the language in the tree conservation ordinance and also in the tree manual that basically says the property owners that truly have a Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 22 of 46 Page 22 of 46 22 agricultural use on their properties are exempt from the requirements of the tree conservation ordinance as per the state law. And in our department, we have an entire policy, and we are working with the city attorney’s office to make sure that we can make a recommendation that which properties qualify for this agriculture exemption. But, in the June 15th meeting, it was discussed that this language should also be part of the tree conservation ordinance. The second change which we have made, again, based on the feedback received from June 15th meeting, the staff has increased the size of the protected tree and also the size of the small tree height class of specimen from 8 inches to 12 inches. So, if someone wants to remove a tree in Milton, they needed a tree removal permit to remove an 8-inch tree. But now, that size has gone up from 8 inches to 12 inches. So, if someone wants to remove a tree of 12 inches, then only they require tree removal permit and not to remove a tree for 8 inches or 9 inches. The third major change that has been made following the June 15th meeting, and again, I will say this is one of the most important changes, as by using the tree conservation ordinance, the staff is trying to incentivize the large lot subdivisions, which is one of the key priorities of the city council. So, initially, we had two classifications for AG1 zoning districts. If the lot size is from 1-3 acres, you are required to have 57 percent of the tree canopy or existing on your property. And if the property is more than 3 acres in area, you are required to have 25 percent or existing tree canopy on your property. But on the June 15th city council meeting, what we heard from the city council that you are looking for a much more tiered approach. And what the Mayor basically said, the city council was looking for a sliding scale. So, based on that feedback, we have made three classifications. So, if the – for AG1 district, if the lot sizes are from – if the lot sizes are less than 1.49 acres, you are required to have 57 percent or existing tree canopy on your lot, on your property. If the property is between 1.5 and 2.99 acres, you are required to have 40 percent or existing tree canopy on your property. And if the property is larger than 3 acres, you’re required to have 25 percent or existing tree canopy on your property. So, basically, we have added one more classification from 1.5 to 2.99 acres. And the fourth change I will say that initially it basically talks about how frequent this tree canopy study should be done. Initially, the Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 23 of 46 Page 23 of 46 23 language was not to exceed five years. So, the last tree canopy study was done in 2017. Initially, the language was not to exceed five years. Now we have added the language that basically says the first study will be done in – not – the first study will be conducted in Fall of 2022. That means in the next two years. And based on the results of that study, the next studies cannot exceed – not to exceed five years. I know there are some city council members who are looking to have a language that basically says not to exceed three years and again, the staff would be fine with that also. So, these are the major four changes that were made following the June 15th meeting. At the back of this, I have my entire presentation from June 15th talking about the goals, objectives, what we are trying to achieve. But I am hoping at this time everyone has memorized the goals and objectives, so I do not want to go through those. But again, if the city council approves the tree conservation ordinance, the next steps will be, number one, is scheduling the workshops. And then the staff would also like to launch a Plant Milton campaign that will basically encourage a tree canopy in the City of Milton. How we can incentivize and how can we encourage the Milton residents to plant more trees. Happy to answer any questions. Mayor Lockwood: Any questions for Parag at this point? Um, – CM Cookerly: Yeah, I have. Mayor Lockwood: Go ahead, Carol. CM Cookerly: So, I thought we had discussions where the understory would be 8- inch DBH. Are we not following that or is that part of – I am having a little trouble understanding it. Parag: So, now, that – again, that tree size has also been increased from 8 inches to 12 inches for the protected tree and for the also understory from 8 inches to 12 inches. CM Cookerly: That would be a mass – I mean do dogwoods even get that big? Female Speaker: Yes. CM Cookerly: Okay, but at how many years? Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 24 of 46 Page 24 of 46 24 Male Speaker: I look forward to this debate as well. I share Councilmember Cookerly’s concern primarily with the understory. I can endorse the larger specimen tree size to 12 inches, but I am concerned about in the understory where a lot of that is the decorative trees that have flowering and they are seasonal that support the look and feel underneath the larger canopy, that we would begin to lose that without any consideration for it because it would be – wouldn’t require a permit to do that. So, I would ask that the staff consider the change to 12 inch DBH for specimen trees and consider leaving it 8 inches for the understory decorative trees, which may need to be named, but I think that would accomplish – I would be more comfortable with that – that it leaves the beautification part and not just the towering trees. I recognize understory is not typically counted in the canopy, but I think there would be an unintended consequence that we would lose some things that we weren’t intending by not having a chance to weigh in on the smaller tree caliper for the trees that are typically more decorative. CM Cookerly: So, I had my landscaper measure our understory trees. I never knew to call them that, so thank you for the terminology, but they’re really old and they’re like 10, 11, 12. I mean, but they were pretty spectacular with their coverage at – I have been there 20 plus years, 6, 7, 8, so I just think that’s misguided. I think I should be 8. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, and let me break in one second before we go too much further with this. Do we have any public comment on this, Tammy? Tammy: No, not on this one. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, I will – Scott Reese: Yes, you do. Tammy: Oh, it wasn’t marked. Scott Reese: If you had looked on the second part of it. Tammy: Did anyone explain to Mr. Reese that you only get to talk once? Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 25 of 46 Page 25 of 46 25 Scott Reese: I’m very slow on it – first meeting, so – Mayor Lockwood: Okay. So, I will go ahead and entertain the public comment and then we can – CM Cookerly: Sure. Mayor Lockwood: I think so, do you have a card there, Tammy, or I just need to get that clarified. Tammy: Because it is only – it’s got – it is only referencing. Scott Reese: I think I put 11-2 or 11-1. 11-2 and 11-1. Mayor Lockwood: Sounds to me like he was trying to – Tammy: Oh, I’m referencing this right here, so I see it. Let me just make note of it. Mayor Lockwood: Trying to save time. But again, I would be glad to allow the public comment and then we’ll get – clear up the card to make sure that we have that on record. Scott Reese: Mr. Mayor and member of council, I am Scott Reese with Brumbelow, Reese & Associates doing business at 13685 Highway 9, Milton, Georgia, 30004. Um, a couple of things on the ordinance. First, I want to commend Steve Krokoff, the City Manager, for putting in extra duty to shepherd the ordinance that’s before you. I think it’s overreaching and other people think it is reaching not far enough, so I think it probably is pretty close to what we need. And I really want to commend him because I think he did extra-extra duty in educating himself, because I kinda doubt that southern woodlands were his forte earlier in his life. And he took the time to guide us and did an extreme job. So, I just want to say that first. Second, from a logistics standpoint, trying to locate every 12-inch pine tree and sweet gum makes our job virtually impossible on larger tracts of land. We have to go out, individually measure, ID, and locate those. I think the compromise that would most benefit the city was to have 15-inch as what came out of the committee for the overstory, the large trees, and a continuation of the preservation of the 8-inch flowering natives that has been on the ordinance books since its origination from Fulton County and adoption at the time for the City of Milton. So, Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 26 of 46 Page 26 of 46 26 that I think compromise would satisfy both, would best serve the community, and its citizens. My primary concern when this was started was to not unduly burden the large family land owners that are still left in the city or the large tracts, the preservation of the rural community. I think the overall gist of this ordinance addresses that and there are enough work arounds that it doesn’t negate the value of the property and will preserve what we most love about the City of Milton. Finally, my one major concern is that in the recompense planting to meet the canopy, I’m afraid that we’re going to get a monoculture of trees planted to meet the density and that somehow or another and not in the ordinance but that you make it a project going forward that someone at the city, the arborist or another staff member contact the University of Georgia School of Forestry, award winning, nationally recognized, shameless alumnus plug, that they be involved somehow in providing a diverse plan of a mix. I’m afraid we are going to just get the same two-inch oak tree because that’s the most bang for your buck of planting. And that as we’ve seen with the Bradford pears and the Leland cypress, if you plant the same thing over and over again, pathogens and insects are going to find that one plant and you’re going to regret it. So, I would hope that you would come up with an incentivized plan to get a more diverse planting scheme that I think would be aesthetically pleasing, environmentally, ecologically, more – I do know if I plant corn in the same field ten years in a row, I am going to have diminishing results. And I think it is going to work the same with the tree canopy. Thank you so much for your time. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, thanks, Scott. Is there any more public comment? Tammy: No, sir. Mayor Lockwood: Unless somebody just says they’ve turned in a card. I’m kidding. All right, I’ll close the public hearing on that. Going back to the discussion we had. Now, going with the 8-inch size for the ornamental trees, is the council – what’s the council’s opinion on that? I know that’s – Laura? I’m just going to try to take these one at a time. On the lower side for the ornamental trees, what’s the council’s feeling on that? CM Bentley: So, I agree. I think that those ornamental trees are what we find a Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 27 of 46 Page 27 of 46 27 lot in the view shed. I’ve been looking at the ones that are around my place, 8 inches are pretty big for you know, dogwoods and red buds and things like that. So, I know that it’s part of the density ordinance currently, so I think that it might be good to retain the thing that is good about that and you know, I would like to see it remain. Mayor Lockwood: Okay. Paul? CM Moore: Yeah, I think I have already shared. [Crosstalk] CM Moore: The same. I support the eight inches on the decorative understory. Mayor Lockwood: I think Carol brought that up. So, Peyton, Joe, and Rick, what’s your thoughts? Male Speaker: I’m fine either way. I don’t have a – Male Speaker: Yeah, I’m good with that. Male Speaker: I am too. Eight is good. Mayor Lockwood: And I realize that’s ornamental and it is in our, has been in the past. Obviously, you have to identify those correctly. How do we do that? Parag: Yes, I also spoke to our city arborist and we also don’t have any concern for if the ornamental trees can remain as 8 inches and the others could be 12 inches. We are fine. Mayor Lockwood: Okay. And then I’m going to bring up the 12-inch. And as to the public comment from Mr. Reese, he mentioned 15. And I would say this. I know at first glance everyone thinks about conserving and preserving and whatnot, Milton and land, you want to save all the trees. It can also have detrimental if we’re too tough because that forces, the tree ordinance can with size and recompense, cost a lot of money. So, the tighter it is, it may force somebody, a large landowner that wanted to keep their land or keep it in big parcels, to have to make smaller lots and more homes on it to offset the cost. So, I’m certainly willing to consider the 15 or as it was or bring it up to council and see what, you know, if you guys want to stay at 12 as written here or if you want to consider anything Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 28 of 46 Page 28 of 46 28 different, 15 on that. Are there any thoughts on that? Carol? CM Cookerly: May I ask a question? I hope that it is not naïve, but I mean the goal is to arrive at the canopy, correct? So, whether these trees are 13, 14, 15, or 16 or 17, ultimately, there’s a responsibility to get to the coverage, is that correct? Okay. Well, it is, I think I understand – I don’t have a problem with the 15 if I understand this the way that I do and the way that that has been explained because there would be recompense and things like that in the number of sweet gums and pine trees that you can get in a condensed areas unlike you can get with oaks and other things because they won’t grow that closely, so I don’t really have a problem with that because we are going for that bigger picture, I think. Unless I’m wrong. What do you think? Mayor Lockwood: Paul? CM Moore: I think, if I remember correctly, and Parag somebody can correct me if I am wrong on this, we were at 15 before and where the 12 came from was during the debate of how far we should go, there was some debate to go to eight and we thought that – or what came out of the committee at that point was 12 was a reasonable compromise. But that was when we were looking at the whole picture, not with the separation of the understory trees versus the specimen trees. So, I’m all about protecting the trees, so I would have no problem going back to 15. Fifteen was at one point in our language, it was acceptable for our first 14 years as a city, so I would have no problem going back to 15 on that. Parag: So, Councilman Paul Moore, you are right. And Sandra, correct me if I am wrong. So, again, it was a negotiation from 8 to 15, so that’s the reason why we landed on 12. Mayor Lockwood: Peyton? CM Jamison: So, yeah, I guess the follow up on Carol’s point is, as long as those are still, no matter what size tree, it is part of the original canopy that the developer has to get to. I think I am perfectly find with that because I think the whole purpose of this was to prevent the mass grading and all of that stuff, which I think, to Carol’s point, the canopy takes care of that and the 15 inches is more of the individual property owner that wants to take down a tree I guess is kind of where I’m going with it. So, as long as that is included in the canopy cover. Okay, yeah. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 29 of 46 Page 29 of 46 29 Mayor Lockwood: Okay, Laura? CM Bentley: Yeah, I’m okay with the 15 inches. I just would request that because the – it seems like the understory trees are important. Could we include a list to include redbuds, dogwoods, sourwoods? Female Speaker: Yes, so we already have the two species list that identifies – Parag: We have those. CM Bentley: From the old – [Crosstalk] Female Speaker: –in the canopies. CM Bentley: From the old ordinance? From the density? Female Speaker: In the new ordinance. Male Speaker: We went through a list. Female Speaker: It actually came from Athens, Clark County. So – CM Bentley: Okay, so it has – Female Speaker: Indigenous species list from UGA. CM Bentley: Okay. Just like magnolias and – Male Speaker: You should look at Auburn University, I’m just – Female Speaker: They have a very good one too. Male Speaker: I know. I’m just saying. Female Speaker: It’s more for Alabama. Right, so we have an extensive tree species list that is an appendix to the manual, and it tells you what’s in that canopy class that will count as the specimen trees, for – so its dogwoods, redbuds, sourwoods. It’s a lot of those. CM Bentley: Okay, just so we know because that’s important. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 30 of 46 Page 30 of 46 30 Male Speaker: We had discussion in the committee about that and Sandra did a great job of really exhausting the search on that to make sure that we captured all of this for the list. Mayor Lockwood: Joe, Rick, do you guys have any thoughts on this? Male Speaker: I’m good. Male Speaker: I’m good with 15. Mayor Lockwood: Okay. The minimum tree canopy coverage on the different size of lots, I know we talked about that. Is everybody good with the layout that’s on here now? Male Speaker: Yes. Mayor Lockwood: I think it makes sense to motivate people to do bigger lots. Really, so the other issue is the time, the three years versus – I know Councilman Moore had talked about three years. I mean my thoughts; I could go either way. If we’re talking 2022, correct, so that’s less than three years from now, and then we’re no more than 5 years in between there. Parag: Not to exceed five years. Mayor Lockwood: Not to exceed. So, if at 2022, which some of you guys will be here then, you could adjust it then. If we had a big change or whatever and wanted to do it at two years, or three years, or no change at five, that’s a possibility too. Parag: That’s the goal. So, again, we don’t want to have – we don’t want to say 2025 to begin with. The first study can be done in the next two years. And based on the results of that study, we can always change our scale. It could be not to exceed three years. It could be whatever it is. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, I’ll open that up. What’s – you guys, discussion on that, thought on that. Male Speaker: Well, I’ve been probably the most outspoken as an advocate for the not to exceed three years. I would just add these thoughts for consideration. I appreciate what staff is trying to do with the 2022 measure. I think that makes a lot of sense. If we’re to go not to Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 31 of 46 Page 31 of 46 31 exceed three years from 2022, we’re actually at five years at that point, from now for what would be another measure. The practicality that comes in for me with asking for consideration on not to exceed three years after the 2022 benchmark would be in the fact that we don’t know what kind of extraordinary things may happen to us in that period of time. We know that there is something extraordinary happening right now. And I’ll cite the example that I did, I think, last time we were together and that was the example given by a local realtor who had five individual cases of perspective homebuyers out here coming in the 1.3 to 1.8-million-dollar range with cash purchases. And it was to a great extent to be perceived as urban flight in the fact that we’re dealing with a crisis that’s going on around the world today. People are looking to get out to more open spaces, get out of the concentration of, in this case, the COVID virus, but you also layer on the fact that there has been civil unrest in our cities more recently as well, there is reason potentially to flee from some of the urban unrest. So, with the fact that we’ve head a healthy economy, we’re in a middle of a crisis. I look forward to the economy recovering when we are past some of these crises. I think there is going to be a lot of development pressure out here because we are a bedroom community that still gives you easy access to the city. If that working environment is still in a city setting, so there is going to be a lot of pressure for development out there that could change our canopy in a more compressed time than we might normally experience. So, I’d rather caution on the side of conservancy in this case and err on the shorter side of the measure, than to go longer. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, anybody else with comments on that? Laura? Peyton? CM Longoria: I think five years makes perfect sense. My prediction is, I mean as long as we have this first one in 2022, because I really think that we’re going to move quickly into an environment where we can get this kind of information almost instantaneously. I really think the technology is going to catch up and be able to understand and deal with the data that we get from satellite images and things like that that would make this information a lot more available. But I agree, it is something we always want to be ahead of. We don’t want to be behind. CM Jamison: I guess my uh, oh, sorry, Joe. Go ahead. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 32 of 46 Page 32 of 46 32 Mayor Lockwood: Go ahead, Peyton. CM Jamison: Sorry. We’re at a kiddie table. So, I guess my only question is as long as it has not to exceed in there, I guess to go to Paul’s point, if we’re seeing this pressure, I mean, we as a council can say like immediately, do it, right? So, I guess that’s my only comment. Male Speaker: And that was my point, too. This kind of a whim. We are going to do it in two years. And as you go through that process and you see the change in the two years when it is done, it says not to exceed. A couple options. You can go okay, at that point say, let’s do it in three years or because we’re really seeing some rapid change. I mean on the flip side, you could put it at not to exceed three years and at 2022, you can say gosh, it hasn’t changed at all. It cost us a whole lot of money and a lot of time. Let’s extend it to five years. So, I think you could do either one as long as you have that option. You’re not locked in, so –you know, you guys have any thoughts on that? Mayor Lockwood: Has everybody weighed in? Male Speaker: I think everybody has – CM Moore: I will circle back and make a comment after everybody’s had a chance to weigh in. Mayor Lockwood: I think – anybody else have anything before Paul gets the final comment? Go ahead, Paul. CM Moore: I would just say I think those all make sense and I appreciate your contribution to help me understand where you’re coming from on that. And I don’t know that I need to fall on my sword over this – an item like this, when I think we’ve all expressed concern for making sure that we’re measuring in a reasonable amount of time and to Councilmember Longoria’s point about the ability for technology to catch up on this, it may be more instantaneous. So, if I subscribe to that theory, probably at this point, not to exceed five with the fact that there is a measure in 2022, we could reconsider if there was concern. So, I’m happy to concede on that one. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, is there anything else that we haven’t discussed? Parag: Okay, these are the four changes. You did get – city council Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 33 of 46 Page 33 of 46 33 members did get the red line version. You also got the final version of the tree conservation ordinance, but these are the four changes that were made after June 15th. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, so basically from this discussion and going through here, what I’m hearing from council is keeping the 8 foot – the 8-inch on the ornamental trees but going up to a 15 inch for the specimen trees. Everybody seemed to be okay with the table on the sliding scale and the same thing with the wording that we have now for the time in between studies, but knowing that there’s flexibility on that if needed or technology change. That’s a good point too. So, is there anything else that you guys want to discuss on that? If not, I’ll open up for a motion. Male Speaker: Just one more quick comment? Mayor Lockwood: Sure. Male Speaker: Thank you. I think Mr. Reese makes a good point about the recompense. And although that’s not a part of this motion, I think that it does warrant consideration by staff and I don’t know that it has to be an assigned project, but I just think as a good steward of our tree ordinance and our intent as a city, it might be a happenstance project to be undertaken, not necessarily an assigned task. Mayor Lockwood: Okay. All right, I will open it up for a motion. CM Bentley: Mayor, I’d like to make a motion to adopt agenda item number 20- 157. Male Speaker: Second. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, but again, do we want to clarify on the points that I read out because that is different than what we’ve got here in front of us. CM Bentley: Okay, so you want me to go through each. Male Speaker: I need to probably remove my second. Mayor Lockwood: I haven’t called your second I don’t think. So, all right, Councilmember Bentley is making a motion, correct. And I think the only thing that read out that was different is the 15-inch versus what’s in front of us. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 34 of 46 Page 34 of 46 34 CM Bentley: Okay. So, Mayor, I would like to make a motion to adopt agenda item number 20-157 with the addition of the 8-inch DBH added for the understory trees and the protected trees to remain at 15 inches. Mayor Lockwood: And I guess that would be – this says ornamental trees are – Parag: Yeah. Yeah. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, just to make sure there’s no question on that. Okay, I have a motion from councilmember Bentley. Do I have a second as read? Female Speaker: Do we have to say anything about the timeframe or is that done? Male Speaker: We didn’t change Mayor Lockwood: Yeah, we didn’t change that. So, do I have a second? CM Jamison: Second. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, I believe it was Councilmember Jamison, so I have a motion from Councilmember Bentley for approval as read and with a second from Councilmember Jamison. All in favor, please say aye. Several: Aye. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bentley moved to approve Agenda Item No. 20-157 with the addition of the 8-inch DBH added for the understory trees and the protected trees to remain at 15 inches. Councilmember Jamison seconded the motion. The motion passed (7-0). NEW BUSINESS Mayor Lockwood: I believe that is unanimous. I do want to also thank staff and everybody and the public and, you know, all involved for – I know this was a lot of work and it has been a long time, but I appreciate everybody’s hard work. Obviously, that is something – when you look around, that’s what you see and hopefully it will keep us apart, so thank you all for all the time and hard work you have put in on this. And I’m not going to give Steve a plug on it. All right, so Tammy, if you would please sound the next new business item. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 35 of 46 Page 35 of 46 35 : It’s the consideration of a proposed consent order in connection with condemnation action filed as civil action file number 20- 91CV327435. It is the Hopewell Road at Thompson Road roundabout. Agenda item number 20-214, Mr. Ken Jarrard. Ken: Mr. Mayor and members of the council, you have in front of you a proposed consent order and judgement. This was something that was discussed in executive session per the Open Meetings Act, we have to come out and ratify any authority given. This was a condemnation the City of Milton filed with respect to a property at 158 Kramer Road, LLC, Jesus Rios Cruz and Ana Rodriguez were the owners. It is a condemnation of 1.04 acres of fee simple right of way. We tendered into the registry of the court $132,600 pursuant to authority provided by the city. In order to settle out the matter, we are actually going to contribute an additional $52,400 for a total take value of $185,000. This proposed order would, in fact, resolve the case and it is my recommendation the city council approve it as stated. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, is there any questions for Ken on that? No, we’ve discussed it. Okay, I’ll open it up for a motion. CM Longoria: Mayor, I move that we approve agenda item number 20-214. CM Moore: Second. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, I have a motion from Councilmember Longoria and a second from Councilmember Moore. In favor – all in favor, please say aye. Several: Aye. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Longoria moved to approve Agenda Item No. 20-214. Councilmember Moore seconded the motion. The motion passed (7-0). Mayor Lockwood: Any opposed? That’s unanimous. Okay, we had another new business item added at our agenda, so if our City Clerk would please sound that item? Tammy: This item is a resolution of the City of Milton authorizing participation in the Apple Development Program and acceptance of Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 36 of 46 Page 36 of 46 36 contracts associated with this program. Mr. David Frizzell. Dave: Good evening, Mayor and Council. What you have before you is a fairly straightforward agreement for the city to participate in the Apple Developer Program. From time to time, the city will develop its own mobile applications or have other companies or contract other companies to write them for us. The we would publish those on the iTunes App Store. But in order to publish those, we would need to accept the terms and conditions of that agreement. And just as an FYI, our first program is going to be Hyperweb, which is being built for us right now, part of the Public Works work order system. Any questions? Mayor Lockwood: Questions? Joe? Because you know all of this is over my head. CM Longoria: So, last meeting, we had a presentation about how we were going to develop the walking bus application. And that was in part because we were engaged in a grant that essentially funded that work and we got good points and good press for being imaginative and that kind of thing. Dave: Sure. CM Longoria: Most of this stuff, though, falls outside of the business of the city. We are not in the business of developing software. And, it is not a simple thing to do. And there’s no prestige in having – log in to the Apple Store in order to publish apps and stuff like that. We should be putting these responsibilities on the vendors that we deal with because they’re best suited to manage that stuff. Now, I don’t mind approving this because I think there’s other uses for it, but I’m really worried that we’re letting certain things, certain responsibilities get outside the realm of where they belong. And we don’t want to be responsible for most of this stuff. Dave: We’re not – we are not using their app. Male Speaker: Dave, let me jump in a minute. Hyperweb has already developed this app for us. It’s already out there. CM Longoria: Who owns the intellectual property? Male Speaker: Hyperweb does. CM Longoria: Okay, so – Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 37 of 46 Page 37 of 46 37 Male Speaker: It’s their app. Its Connect Milton right now. So, that’s the actual application. We’re looking to improve upon the current application because it’s kind of clunky. And enable us to – in order for us to be able to do that, Apple made us re-up this agreement. And that’s the extent of what’s going on here. CM Longoria: Okay. I don’t have a problem with it. But I’m just – Male Speaker: He said it better than I could. CM Longoria: Yeah. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, and I think if there are no other questions, I will open it up for a motion. CM Bentley: Mayor, I’d like to approve the resolution of the City of Milton to authorize participation in the Apple Developer Program and acceptance of contracts associated with this program. CM Mohrig: Second. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, so I have got a motion of approval from Councilmember Bentley with a second from Councilmember Mohrig. All in favor please say aye. Several: Aye. Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bentley moved to approve a Resolution of the City of Milton to authorize participation in the Apple Developer Program and acceptance of contracts associated with this program. Councilmember Mohrig seconded the motion. The motion passed (7-0). Mayor Lockwood: That’s unanimous. Thank you, Dave. Okay, we’ll move on to reports. I want to bring something up. I had a little bit of internal discussion on the CPAC Committee. We have to vote in a chairperson. And I believe in the past, it has been usually the chairman of the planning commission. So, that being said, and I think Ron Gilbert has expressed interest in doing it or whatnot. I know we’re not taking any formal vote on it now, because I’m just bringing it up, but whatever we need to do from a staff perspective could bring that up, put that as an agenda item on our next meeting Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 38 of 46 Page 38 of 46 38 if we have to do a formal – if, go back, if staff would go back to look to make sure we do what we need to do on that Parag. But is everybody, in general, okay with the chairman of the planning commission as has been done in the past or whatnot? Male Speaker: It’s historically been the chair. Mayor Lockwood: Yeah, historically. The other thing, too, I believe, Parag and I have talked, we need a couple of ex officio members or members of council to be a part of the group. That’s correct, right? Parag: So, we have our first CPAC meeting on August 12th, so we would like to have the planning, we would like to have the chair and the two ex officio city council members before that. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, and I have talked with Councilmember Moore being interested in that and I would be glad to appoint him to that. Is there another council member that’s interested in serving on that – in that position. CM Longoria: Can we nominate somebody? Mayor Lockwood: Well, I was going to say, if nobody wants to raise their hand, be careful. You might get nominated. CM Cookerly: Could you give me the scope of the responsibilities? Mayor Lockwood: Parag, I’m going to let you or actually, councilmembers that – you have been through it before, too, a couple of councilmembers here, too. Parag: One option could be, I’m just saying this, it is up to you. One option could be like we have different council districts. If Paul Moore is representing one council district, maybe the other city council member can represent some other part of the city? Mayor Lockwood: I think the question more from Councilmember Cookerly is just what does this entail for this person on the council. Parag: So, again, it is, as the city attorney’s office just told us, these are the ex officio members. Again, they are the liaisons between the CPAC and the city council. We are planning to have one CPAC meeting, let’s say, once a month or something, once every other Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 39 of 46 Page 39 of 46 39 month, around two-hour meeting, from 6:00 to 8:00. It depends, we would like that the city council members should attend that meeting. And we will just keep them engaged, but everything, as you know, everything which we work on we always bring in front of the city council to provide you an update. That will always be there, but we would also like those two ex officio members to be part of the CPAC meetings. CM Moore: I have a question. CM Cookerly: Why is it – oh. Mayor Lockwood: Hold on a second. Carol? CM Cookerly: I was going to say, I think that would be good for me. I don’t know that I would be good for you. Mayor Lockwood: It is more meetings you could go to. CM Cookerly: It sounds interesting. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, Paul, you have – CM Moore: Yeah, just having participated at all of the ones that we have done historically, I would say that the role really is as an observer. You’re not a voting member, CPAC members are already identified and they’re the voting body of the process. It’s driven by an outside consultant supported by staff. It’s really a review of our long-term look for the city. So, the liaison role really is simply to report back and forth, either a message from council to the committee or committee to the council. I can think of maybe not finite examples but examples where the CPAC may have referred or deferred to the councilmember who is present for a perspective on it, but it is not to cast a vote or – simply to be there as an advisor as needed, but mostly to observe. Mayor Lockwood: And a liaison. Okay. Peyton, do you have something before we – CM Jamison: Yeah, just a quick question because last – I don’t know why we have two because last time when I chaired it, Karen was the only – Mayor Lockwood: Yeah, Karen was, so I don’t know why there are two. Male Speaker: It is a state DP requirement. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 40 of 46 Page 40 of 46 40 Parag: Yeah, it is the state, it basically says city council members – there is an s attached to it, so that’s the reason why the city attorney’s office says it says members, we should have at least two. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, before nomination, going back again, is there anybody on here that personally would like to do this or thinks. Male Speaker: Mayor, can I just jump in, I apologize. You are not going to actually be able to do the appointment tonight. Mayor Lockwood: No, no. Again, and that’s what I had said. Yeah, just like the chair, if we just get a nomination and then we can confirm it at our next meeting, correct? Male Speaker: Will that work? Male Speaker: That’s fine. As long as you’re not voting on it, I’m good. Mayor Lockwood: Right. Right. Absolutely would not vote, but I’m just trying to get a consensus. Make sure I’m not out of line. CM Cookerly: Are you going to do it? Mayor Lockwood: Because we will have to nominate somebody, or they’ll have to – Male Speaker: It sounds like you’ve got two. CM Cookerly: Are you interested, Rick? CM Mohrig: You know what, Carol? I will let you handle this one. Male Speaker: We need two. Mayor Lockwood: No, we’ve got. I have asked for Paul. Male Speaker: Oh, I did see that, sorry. CM Cookerly: Oh, are you interested? Mayor Lockwood: Paul’s interested. Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 41 of 46 Page 41 of 46 41 CM Cookerly: Oh, didn’t know you were interested. Mayor Lockwood: So, we need one more. CM Cookerly: Want to do it? CM Moore: Yeah. CM Cookerly: Okay. Mayor Lockwood: So, yeah, we have one, but do we have two? Laura, do you? Carol? CM Bentley: Rick, did you say that you are interested? CM Mohrig: What I was saying, I didn’t speak up and if Carol is interested, I’m fine with Carol taking that on. Male Speaker: We can get three or four. Male Speaker: Well put. CM Bentley: Carol, you’ve got it. Merry Christmas. CM Cookerly: I’m a little concerned about work travel, but you’ve handled that before. CM Moore: Our meetings are typically planned pretty far out. And I think the first one is a Wednesday, which is – Wednesdays are typically not great. If you’re having to travel, it breaks up the week. But with enough lead time, I can work around it. But – CM Cookerly: I can give it my best shot. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, so again, we are not voting on it or whatever, but we know there is interest from two councilmembers here, so that at our next meeting, if we could put that on the agenda. Male Speaker: We will. It will be on the special called on the 10th. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, thank you. Does anybody on council have anything they want to report on? Okay. Male Speaker: Yeah, Joe, real quick. The discussion I had with you earlier today, Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 42 of 46 Page 42 of 46 42 and I think with our city manager about some concern about the curriculum with Fulton County taking out what was going to be a potential feed to our firefighter program. I’m happy to report that the latest update on that is it’s been reinstated. And so, Fulton County has decided to cooperate with the request of the community and it is back in place. Male Speaker: Wow, good. Male Speaker: Good news. Male Speaker: Real good news. Mayor Lockwood: Okay, and we’ll move on to our staff reports. We have got Public Works. STAFF REPORTS Department Updates 1. PUBLIC WORKS Robert Drewry: Thank you, Dennis. Good evening Mayor and Council. A couple projects I’m kind of excited about advising you on. We’re out to bid now for our extension of our sidewalk on Cogburn. Actually, we just got bids in and we’re evaluating those bids now. So, that’s a good project. Looking forward to that. We’re also out to bid for construction of the Hopewell/Thompson roundabout. And we’re out to bid for the construction of the Hopewell/Hamby roundabout. So, we should see some good bids and hopefully will be presented to you in the very near future. So, that’s kind of exciting. I know they are long waiting and there will be some construction activity going on heavily around the city before the end of the year. Also, out to bid is the Public Words Maintenance Operation contract. Or contract or Public Works contactor essentially. We have that out on the streets to bid as well. We have completed two stormwater repair projects, one of them at Oakhurst Leaf and the other one at Hopewell Crest. We issued 14 right of way permits for the month of July and nine of those were right of ways. Two of those were residential driveways and three of those were landscaping irrigation permits. For workorders for the month of July, we had 96, down a little bit from what we’re used to on an average. The most common issue was sign issues, which is just about typical. And it pretty much levels out from there with potholes, tree issues, Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 43 of 46 Page 43 of 46 43 stormwater issues, and yes, dead animals, and debris and school flashers. They all almost leveled out, so, a pretty active month of July, and again, I’m excited about having those projects out to bid. Are there any questions? Mayor Lockwood: Any questions? Mayor Lockwood: Okay, thanks. Before Tom speaks, I just want to thank you for stepping up with your new position as acting Parks and Rec – 2. PARKS & RECREATION Tom: Lots has been going on with Parks and Recreation. As you mentioned, we’ve got a change in staff, so Thomas Rhodes and myself are taking the helm. All the facilities are looking great. The fields look real good. They’re getting rest. We will be shutting down the grass fields at Bell Memorial Park tomorrow, give them a little rest before the Fall season starts. For summer programming, Lacrosse put on two summer camps and a summer program, 260 kids. That’s just girls. The boys did not do any boys’ lacrosse. Nine weeks of basketball camps. I don’t have the numbers yet, but I ran rough numbers and there’s probably between 180 and 220 kids that participated in that. Baseball, they did summer camps and a summer program to kind of replace the spring. And summer tennis is wrapping up now. Moving forward to the fall, we’re looking at allowing all of our programs to continue with COVID protocols in place. I’m going to be adding another one that they’re required to let me know if there’s a positive test or if there’s someone with cases. I don’t need to know the name, particularly, but I want to know what team they were on if it is a sport or what class it was if it is a program, so me and Matt Marietta can evaluate what we’re doing moving forward there. And fall athletics should start up middle of the month. We’ve started to get some rentals picking up, too. We had 15 last month and we’ve got 15 already this month and they usually trickle in. Could have a weekly time. So, things are going well there. The pool. The pool’s operating very well. Have had very little issues. The pool hits capacity almost every weekend. We’ve sold Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 44 of 46 Page 44 of 46 44 351 passes which is up from last year, only four more, but we have sold 2,395 drop ins. The whole last summer, it was 858. So, the pool is getting utilized this summer and a lot of it has to do with all the work that’s been done. Lastly, we’ve got some Eagle Scouts’ projects that are just wrapping up actually this week. Bethwell Community Center got about half of it repainted, what they could reach without ladders. And all the decking and all the stairs are all repainted. And they did pressure washing of all the concrete and repainted and repaired fences. That’s one project. And then we had a new wooden gate put in at Cox Road to replace a chain link gate. So, any questions? Mayor Lockwood: Questions for Tom? Okay. Thank you, sir. Tom: Thank you. Appreciate it. 3. POLICE Mayor Lockwood: Chief Austin? Chief Austin: Greetings Mayor and Members of Council. Looking at our latest crime stats report, things are looking pretty good. We’re down about 3 percent from where we were at this time last year. Area traffic crashes were down significantly, so in a 30 percent reduction from this time last year. And while we can attribute some of that reduction to less traffic from the pandemic with many more folks telecommuting, other jurisdictions, while they’re also experiencing less traffic overall, they’ve seen a significant surge in personal injury and fatality crashes. Some more aggressive drives seem to have taken the reduction in traffic as an opportunity to speed and drive aggressively. Fortunately, however, we’ve not seen this trend in Milton. We’re currently down 31 percent in personal injury crashes and alcohol related crashes are always showing a downward trend. Continue to actively conduct focused traffic controls in our high crash corridors and our current approach seems to be very effective. Over the past several months, of the many challenges of the pandemic, one has been recruiting new police officers. PD – earlier this year, we developed a robust plan for recruiting which was going to entail some travels to do some more regional recruiting, letting people know what a great community Milton is Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 45 of 46 Page 45 of 46 45 to work in, but we quickly found that that wasn’t going to work as many of, obviously, the recruiting fairs were cancelled, understandably, or postponed indefinitely. So, we quickly reworked our efforts to increase our social media presence and our electronic recruiting efforts. And I am pleased to report that our efforts have been met with success. As of early July, we have all of our police officer slots filled. One recruit was already Georgia certified, so he is out in the field now training with a field training officer and the other three recruits are in various stages of their academy training. So, this is certainly great news in a very tough law enforcement recruiting environment and after these new officers complete their training, we hope to have an opportunity to introduce them in a more formal setting. But for now, we’re very happy to have them as part of Team Milton. That’s all I have this evening unless you have any questions. Mayor Lockwood: Any questions for Chief? As always, thanks to you and all your guys. Except for Mulvey. Just kidding. Thank you, guys. Chief Austin: Thank you. Mayor Lockwood: Appreciate everything you do. All right, is there anything else? If not, I will ask for a motion to adjourn. Male Speaker: I move we adjourn. Male Speaker: Second. Mayor Lockwood: Do I have a second? I have a motion and a second to adjourn. All in favor, please say aye. Several: Aye. Mayor Lockwood: That’s unanimous. ADJOURNMENT Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jamison moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:44 pm. Councilmember Mohrig seconded the motion. The motion passed (7-0). Regular Meeting of the Milton City Council Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:00 pm Page 46 of 46 Page 46 of 46 46 Date Approved: September 9, 2020 __________________________________ _____________________________ Sudie AM Gordon, City Clerk Joe Lockwood, Mayor