Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket - PC - 01-29-2008 City of Milton Deerfield Professional Centre 13000 Deerfield Parkway Building 100, Suite 107 C Milton, GA 30004 REVISED AS OF 1/24/08 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday January 29, 2008, 7:00 pm Agenda Item Description Meeting Dates** Staff Recommendation PC Recommendation I. Invocation II. Call to Order III. Pledge of Allegiance IV. Public Comment V. Approval of Minutes Minutes from the December 19, 2007 Planning Commission Meeting Approval VI. REZONINGS New RZ07-022/ VC07-016 Bethany Bend Road Bajun American Properties, LP. Korey Jones Rolader & Rolader Merryl S. Mandus To rezone from AG-1 and TR (Townhouse Residential) to TR (Townhouse Residential) to develop 47 ranch-style homes at a density of 4.67 units per acre. The applicant is also requesting a concurrent variance to reduce the setback from 100 feet to 10 feet for pool fencing (Article 19.3.12.B.3) CZIM – 1/2/08 DRB- 1/8/08 PC- 1/29/08 Withdrawal Withdrawal VII. USE PERMITS New U07-011/ VC07-017 Hopewell Road Monticello Real Estate Invest, LLC JT Adams A Use Permit for a Private School to be developed with 5 buildings for a total of 63,400 square feet with a maximum of 325 students for Kindergarten – 8th graders. The applicant is also requesting the following 4- part concurrent variance: 1) To reduce the building setback along the north property line from 100 feet to 85 feet (19.4.40.B.3) 2) To reduce the 75-foot buffer and 10-foot improvement setback to the extent necessary to all the septic field to encroach. (Article 12H.3.1C.2.) 3) To increase the 20 foot setback from the landscape CZIM – 1/2/08 DRB- 1/8/08 PC- 1/29/08 Deferral 30 Days Deferral 30 Days **Meeting Codes: CZIM-Community Zoning Information Meeting; DRB-Design Review Board; PC-Planning Commission; MCC-Mayor and City Council W:\Board of Commissions\Planning Commission\Master PC Agenda 1.29.08\PCAGENDA JAN 08 Revised.doc 1 City of Milton Deerfield Professional Centre 13000 Deerfield Parkway Building 100, Suite 107 C Milton, GA 30004 Agenda Item Description Meeting Dates** Staff Recommendation PC Recommendation strip to 500 feet. (12H.3.5.C.1) 4) To allow parking between the right of way and the building. (Article 12H.3.5.F.3) VIII. TEXT AMENDMENTS New A. RZ08-01 To amend Article 3.3.12, definition of “Landscaping Business” in the City of Milton Zoning Ordinance PC-1/29/08 Withdrawal XI. ADJOURN **Meeting Codes: CZIM-Community Zoning Information Meeting; DRB-Design Review Board; PC-Planning Commission; MCC-Mayor and City Council W:\Board of Commissions\Planning Commission\Master PC Agenda 1.29.08\PCAGENDA JAN 08 Revised.doc 2 RZ07-022/VC07-016 Bethany Summit The applicant submitted an improper application for the proposed rezoning to be heard at the 1/29/08 meeting. Further, because of the delay he is unable to continue with the request and is asking for a WITHDRAWAL of the application. A public hearing will be held since it was advertised but Staff supports the request of WITHDRAWAL. PETITION NUMBER(S): U07-011/VC07-017 PROJECT NAME The Academy PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 13620 Hopewell Road DISTRICT, LAND LOT 2/2 909 OVERLAY DISTRICT Northwest Fulton Overlay EXISTING ZONING AG-1 (Agricultural) ACRES 22.15 EXISTING USE Single Family Residence PROPOSED USE Use Permit for a Private School for Kindergarten through 8th Grade up to 325 students (Article 19.4.40) OWNER Jean Elizabeth Brown Smith & James Thomas Brown ADDRESS 13620 Hopewell Road PETITIONER/REPRESENTATIVE Monticello Real Estate Invest, LLC / J.T. Adams ADDRESS 8480 Holcomb Bridge Road, Suite 200 Alpharetta, GA 30022 PHONE 678-679-0365 INTENT To develop a Private School with 5 buildings for a total of 63,400 square feet with a maximum of 325 students for Kindergarten – 8th graders. The applicant is also requesting the following 4-part concurrent variance: 1) To reduce the building setback along the north property line from 100 feet to 85 feet (19.4.40.B.3) 2) To reduce the 75-foot buffer and 10-foot improvement setback to the extent necessary to allow the septic fields to encroach. (Article 12H.3.1C.2.) 3) To increase the 20 foot setback from the landscape strip to 500 feet. (12H.3.5.C.1) 4) To allow parking between the right of way and the building. (Article 12H.3.5.F.3) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION U07-011 – DEFERRAL UNTIL FEBRUARY 19, 2008 VC07-017 – DEFERRAL UNTIL FEBRUARY 19, 2008 The applicant has requested a deferral to allow more time to work with the area residents. Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 1 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 LOCATION MAP Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 2 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 CURRENT ZONING MAP Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 3 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 SITE PLAN RECEIVED – DECEMBER 6, 2007 1/24/2008 U07-011/VC07-017 Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 Page 4 of 20 SUBJECT SITE LOOKING NORTH Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 5 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 SUBJECT SITE – LOOKING WEST Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 6 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 SUBJECT SITE – LOOKING EAST FROM REAR PROPERTY LINE SUBJECT SITE: The subject site is a 22.15 acre tract of agriculturally zoned land, located on the west side of Hopewell Road. The subject site is developed with a single-family residence. It is located within the Agricultural, Forestry and Mining Land Use designation on the Focus Fulton 2025 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 7 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 Existing uses and zoning of nearby property (See Map following table) Location Parcel / Zoning Petition Zoning / Name Approved Density/Min. Heated Floor Area Same land lot as subject site 1 U01-13 AG-1 (Agricultural) Chandler Academy 1,512.35 gross sq. ft. per acre Restricted to 60 students East 2 (AG-1) AG-1 (Agricultural) Sandy Creek Farms 1 unit per acre Est. 2,500 sq. ft. East 3 (AG-1) AG-1 (Agricultural) Scattered homes N/A Northeast 4 (AG-1) AG-1 (Agricultural) North Park Subdivision 1 unit per acre Est. 3,000 sq. ft. North 5 (AG-1) AG-1 (Agricultural) Scattered homes N/A West/Northwest 6 (AG-1) AG-1 (Agricultural) The Lake at Cooper Sandy 1 unit per acre Est. 3,000 sq. ft. South 7 (AG-1) AG-1 (Agricultural) Scattered homes N/A Further South 8 Z94-127 R-2A (Single Family Dwelling District) Conditional Brookshade 0.98 dwelling unit per acre 2,500 sq. ft. Same land lot as subject site 9 (AG-1) AG-1 (Agricultural) Single-family N/A Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 8 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 EXISTING USES AND ZONING MAP Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 9 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 In the interest of the public health, safety and welfare, the Mayor and City Council may exercise limited discretion in evaluating the site proposed for a use that requires a Use Permit. In exercising such discretion pertaining to the subject use, the Mayor and City Council shall consider each of the following as outlined in Article 19.2.4 of the Zoning Ordinance; Use Permit Considerations. Staff has reviewed said items pertaining to the subject use, and, offers the following comments: A. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the land use or economic development plans adopted by the Mayor and City Council: Provided the applicant complies with the Recommended Conditions of this petition and the Use Permit requirements of Article 19.4.40. of the Zoning Ordinance, the proposed development is consistent with the intent and following policies of the Comprehensive Plan: • Encourage compatible institutional uses in neighborhoods and communities. • Encourage development consistent with the surrounding scale, transition of densities and uses, and Comprehensive Plan policies, where appropriate. B. Compatibility with land uses and zoning districts in the vicinity of the property for which the use permit is proposed; If developed in accordance with Staff’s Recommended Conditions and the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, the proposed private school is expected to be compatible with other land uses in the surrounding area. C. Whether the proposed use may violate local, state and/or federal statutes, ordinances or regulations governing land development; The proposed use does not violate any known local, state and/or federal statutes, ordinances or regulations governing land development. D. The effect of the proposed use on traffic flow, vehicular and pedestrian, along adjoining streets; The proposed use will generate an increase in traffic but should be mitigated by the recommended conditions. E. The location and number of off-street parking spaces; Article 18.2.1 requires the applicant to provide the larger of 2 per classroom or one per 35 sq. ft. in largest assembly area, whichever is Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 10 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 larger. There will be a total of 20 classrooms (40 spaces) and the largest assembly area is 6,000 square feet (171 spaces). Article 19.4.10 requires the applicant to locate parking outside of the minimum 60-foot front yard building setback. The applicant has provided approximately 70 spaces, which does not meet the required number of spaces. F. The amount and location of open space; The applicant’s site plan indicates that approximately half of the subject site is undeveloped. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development will provide adequate open space for the proposed development. G. Protective screening; If developed in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Northwest Fulton Overlay District, the buffer and landscape strip requirements will provide adequate screening for the proposed development. Staff notes that later in the report the requested variance to reduce the buffer is being recommended for denial. H. Hours and manner of operation; The applicant indicates that the hours of operation will be 7:00 am to 7:00 pm, Monday through Friday. I. Outdoor lighting; At the time of Land Disturbance Permit the site shall be in compliance with Article 12H.3.4 of the Northwest Fulton Overlay District regarding outdoor lighting. Staff notes that the subject site’s required buffers, and existing screening, will help mitigate the impact of lights on the adjacent properties. J. Ingress and egress to the property. The applicant’s site plan indicates one curb cut on Hopewell Road. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development will have limited impact upon the community if developed with the recommended conditions. Staff is of the opinion that a private school is an appropriate use for this location based on the above consideration. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL CONDITIONAL of U007-011 SITE PLAN ANALYSIS Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 11 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 Based on the applicant’s site plan submitted to the Community Development Department on December 6, 2007, Staff offers the following considerations: USE PERMIT STANDARDS The applicant’s site plan meets all of the special use standards required for private schools, except for Article 19.4.40 Section B.3 which states that buildings and refuse areas shall not be located within 100 feet of a residential district and/or AG-1 district used for single family. It is Staff’s opinion that the private school may be arranged in a manner to accommodate the required one- hundred (100) foot setback from residential and AG-1 districts. The applicant has not shown evidence of a hardship that is not self-imposed. Therefore, Staff recommends DENIAL of Part 1 of the Concurrent Variance VC07-017. Northwest Overlay District BUILDING HEIGHT Article 12H.3.5 Section D.1 of the Northwest Overlay District requires a maximum height limit of two stories with the maximum height 30 feet from average-finished grade to the bottom of the roof eave. The applicant’s letter of intent has indicated that they will remain within these requirements. LANDSCAPE STRIPS AND BUFFERS Article 12H.3.1 Section A.1 of the Northwest Overlay District requires a 10-foot wide strip along the road. It is not shown on the site plan but it appears there is sufficient area to meet this standard. Article 12H.3.1 Section C.1 of the Northwest Overlay District requires a seventy- five (75) foot-wide undisturbed buffer, with a 10’ improvement setback, shall be located adjacent to all AG-1 zoning districts and all property zoned, used, or developed for residential uses. The applicant has stated that the septic fields are needed in the locations indicated on the site plan. Staff is of the opinion that the septic fields should be relocated so that the appropriate buffer is provided to protect the adjacent residences. The applicant has not shown evidence of a hardship that is not self-imposed. Therefore, Staff recommends DENIAL of Part 2 of the Concurrent Variance VC07-017 BUILDING SETBACKS Article 12H.3.5 Section C of the Northwest Overlay District requires a maximum 20-foot building setback from the edge of the required landscape strip and/or easements for all properties and lots located adjacent to public rights-of-way that are 0 to 400 feet from an intersection. The applicant’s site plan does not Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 12 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 show compliance with the requirement. It appears that the building could be reconfigured in such a way as to meet this requirement. The applicant has not yet shown evidence of a hardship that is not self-imposed. Therefore, Staff recommends DENIAL of Part 3 of the Concurrent Variance VC07-017. PARKING REQUIREMENTS The following chart illustrates the parking required by Article 18 of the City of Milton Zoning Ordinance for the proposed use: Proposed Use Minimum Requirement Spaces Provided Private school with approximately twenty (20) classrooms and 6,000 sq. ft. assembly space • Greater of 2 spaces per classroom (40 spaces) or one per 35 sq. ft. in largest assembly area (171 spaces) 171 spaces required • 70 paved spaces 70 spaces provided Staff notes that the applicant is providing seventy (70) parking spaces, which does not meet the required one-hundred seventy-one (171) parking spaces required per Article 18 of the City of Milton Zoning Ordinance. It also appears that the site plan is not in compliance with the landscape and layout requirements of Article 12H.3.1 Section B. The applicant may request an administrative variance to reduce the parking by 17 spaces. In addition, they can request a variance to reduce the parking from the Board of Zoning Appeals at a later date. LOCATION OF PARKING The applicant has requested a concurrent variance to allow parking between the street and the building. It appears that there is sufficient room to locate the parking to the rear of the main building. It is Staff’s opinion that the applicant has not shown a hardship that is not self-imposed. Therefore, Staff recommends DENIAL of Part 4 of the Concurrent Variance VC07-017. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS The applicant has provided the following as additional building information: Administrative Building +/- 16,000 sq. ft. Classroom Wings +/- 41,000 sq. ft. Chapel/Auditorium +/- 6,000 sq. ft.; seating for 300 persons Historic Structure TBD +/- 400 sq. ft. Number of classrooms +/- 20 Number of students Kindergarten thru eighth grade +/-325 Number of staff +/- 25 Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 13 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 CITY ARBORIST The proposed development will not affect any specimen trees on the site. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT On January, 2, 2008 the applicant was present at the Community Zoning Information Meeting held at the Milton City Hall. There were forty-four people in attendance from the community. One community member was concerned about the proposed developed, citing many unanswered questions. The applicants presented their plan to the Milton Design Review Board on January 8, 2008. Public Comments – Staff has received one phone call in opposition to the proposal from the owner of Chandler Academy that is located to the south of the subject site. City of Milton Design Review Board Meeting – January 8, 2008 The following recommendations were made by the DRB: • Increase buffer between septic field and adjacent property • Comply with Northwest Overlay requirements • No review by Board of hardships, only site plan. Public Notice Requirements The use permit petition was advertised in the Milton Herald on January 23, 2008 and the sign was installed before the required date of January 2, 2008 along the frontage of Hopewell Road. The notice of rezoning was sent, to adjacent property owners, on January 14, 2008. Public Participation Plan and Report The applicant has met the requirements of the Public Participation Plan. The applicant will be required to submit the public participation report 7 days prior to the Mayor and City Council meeting. CONCLUSION The proposed private school is consistent with Council and Plan Policies and compatible with the surrounding area, if developed in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Staff’s Recommended Conditions. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL CONDITIONAL of the proposed Use Permit for the private school. Staff however recommends DENIAL of PARTS 1, 2, 3, AND 4 of Concurrent Variance VC07-017. Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 14 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS If this petition is approved by the Mayor and City Council, it should be approved USE PERMIT for a private school (Article 19.4.40) CONDITIONAL subject to the owner’s agreement to the following enumerated conditions. Where these conditions conflict with the stipulations and offerings contained in the Letter of Intent, these conditions shall supersede unless specifically stipulated by the Mayor and City Council. 1) To the owner’s agreement to restrict the use of the subject property as follows: a) Restrict the use of the subject property to a private school and accessory uses at a maximum density of 2,862.3 square feet per acre zoned or a total of 63,400 square feet, whichever is less. b) Restrict the number of students to 325. 2) To the owner’s agreement to abide by the following: a) To the site plan received by the Milton Community Development Department on December 6, 2007. Said site plan is conceptual only and must meet or exceed the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and these conditions prior to the approval of a Land Disturbance Permit. Unless otherwise noted herein, compliance with all conditions shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 3) To the owner’s agreement to the following site development considerations: a) All building entrances shall have a direct connection to the sidewalk network. b) The site plan must provide adequate fire truck access to all buildings on site, in alleys and one-way conditions; as acceptable to the Transportation Engineer and Fire Marshal. c) Provide one multi bay bicycle rack at every building. 4) To the owner’s agreement to abide by the following requirements, dedication and improvements: a) Prior to the approval of a Land Disturbance Permit, reserve the Right of Way along property frontage of Hopewell Road as necessary to Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 15 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 provide compliance with the Transportation Master Plan and the adjacent developments, according to the definitions in the Right of Way Ordinance. b) Prior to the approval of a Land Disturbance Permit, dedicate at no cost to the City of Milton, sufficient land as necessary to provide the Right of Way for the approved final site plan including the following: i. Provide the following road improvements and necessary striping as approved by the Transportation Engineer for Milton: 1. SB Right turn lane on Hopewell Road at site driveway 2. NB Left turn lane on Hopewell Road at site driveway 3. Provide overlay and striping for full width of Hopewell Road the length of property lines plus any additional taper lengths necessary. ii. Provide at least 10.5 feet of right-of-way from the edge of pavement of all abutting road improvements, along the entire property frontage, as well as allow the necessary construction easements while the rights-of-way are being improved. iii. Provide easements along Hopewell Road as required for the Milton Trail, as required by the Community Development Director. iv. Provide ten foot wide asphalt multi-use trail along the entire Hopewell Road frontage of the property to be located at the back of the Right of Way. v. Provide a black four-board equestrian style fence adjacent to the trail as approved by the Director of Community Development. vi. Provide six foot wide concrete sidewalk connecting the multi- use trail on Hopewell Road to the buildings on the site. c) Any new required entrances shall meet the Community Service Policies and AASHTO guidelines, or roads be reconstructed to meet such criteria, at the approval of the Transportation Engineer for Milton. i. The existing driveway at 13620 Hopewell Road shall be modified to provide access to the school and the existing structure at this location. There shall be no other access driveways allowed for this site. Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 16 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 ii.)The Hopewell Road access driveway to the school shall be a right/left in, left out, and right out driveway. This 3 lane section shall extend a minimum of 200’ or the 95% queue length, whichever is greater. 5) To the owner’s agreement to abide by the following: a) The developer’s Professional Engineer shall demonstrate to the City by engineering analysis submitted with the LDP application, that the discharge rate and velocity of the storm water runoff resulting from the development is restricted to seventy-five percent (75%) of the pre-development conditions. Locations shall be as approved by the Stormwater Engineer. b) The water quality and detention facilities shall utilize earthen embankments, where possible. Walled structures are not encouraged. If walled structures are proposed, they must meet the acceptable design standards of the Department of Community Development. i. Detention facility shall have a six foot high, five-board equestrian style fence with two inch by four inch welded wire constructed around it. c) The Developer shall utilize GASWCC limited application controls. All water quality and detention facilities shall have vegetated surfaces to be regularly maintained by the owner. d) Provide a maximum 75 percent impervious, per drainage basin, at maximum build-out. e) Provide for maximum slopes of 3:1 and a maximum disturbed area of sixteen acres open at any time as shown on the LDP phasing plan, as approved by the Stormwater Engineer. Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 17 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 APPENDIX A Comments on Public Services and Utilities Note: Various City and/or County departments that may or may not be affected by the proposed development provide the following information. Comments herein are based on the applicant’s conceptual site plan and are intended as general non-binding information and in no manner suggest a final finding by the commenter. All projects, if approved are required to complete the City of Milton Plan Review process prior to the commencement of any construction activity. Transportation: • Site plan does not show all proposed improvements to site entrances including turn lanes • Analysis indicated drive on site plan does not meet spacing minimums • Show trip generation rates used for each land use in table • Parking analysis indicates 40 parking spaces are required and 70 spaces are provided • Drive location should be shifted to the north as recommended in the study to meet minimum spacing requirements. • Current GDOT practice on Traffic Signal Warrants is to exclude right turning volume when a separate right turn lane exists. At both intersections that signals are recommended, the significant majority of the volume is right turning. With the right turn volume, these intersections would likely meet signal warrants, but without the right turn volumes, it is likely that they would not meet warrants. A full warrant analysis should be done on these two intersections. • Site plan does not clearly indicate building uses. • Underground detention is shown. Why are the lakes not used? • Water quality features should be placed to protect the lake. • What is the wetland study area? • Septic system area on north property line does not seem like an appropriate area. • Provide a combination plat. • Show correct buffers on both lakes and on stream. • Clearly denote flood zones AE and X. • Provide bus route or drop off route. • Is Olen B. Davis & Tamara Davis property in or out? • Site plan does not show current conditions on the existing site south of this project including the right turn lane and sidewalk. • Delineate between vehicular and pedestrian paths on plan. • Is there a bridge/culvert over the wetland area? Is this a buffered stream? Fulton County Health Department: • This department recommends that the applicant be required to connect the proposed development to public water available to the site. • Due to the inaccessibility of public sewer to serve the proposed development, this department recommends that individual onsite sewage management systems be utilized. However, the “Design Limits for conventional or chamber Septic Tank Systems” for County Health Department as defined by Georgia Department of Natural Resource (DNR) are limited by size and subsurface introduction of effluents. Onsite sewage management systems having a septic tank capacity of greater than ten thousand (10,000) gallons, or where the total length of absorption trenches required, would exceed three thousand (3000) linear feet, or where the total absorption trench bottom area Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 18 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 required, would exceed nine thousand (9000) square feet, will be governed and placed under the statutory authority and jurisdiction of the Department of Natural Resources. • Due to the inaccessibility of public sanitary sewer to sewer the proposed development, this department recommends that individual onsite sewage management systems be utilized. However, this department will require all necessary percolation and soil data, required layouts, and supportive data be submitted for review and determined acceptable prior to preliminary plat and/or Land Disturbance Permit (LDP) approval. • Since this proposed development constitutes a premise where people work, live, or congregate, onsite sanitary facilities will be mandatory, prior to use or occupancy. • Since this development utilizes an onsite sewage management system, the owner must obtain approval from this department prior to issuance of a building permit and before building construction or renovation. • This facility must comply with the Fulton County Clean Indoor Air Ordinance. • If this proposed development includes a food service facility, the owner must submit kitchen plans for review and approval by this department before issuance of a building permit and beginning construction. The owner must obtain a food service permit prior to opening. • This department is requiring that all existing structures to be demolished must be inspected by a certified pest control operator to insure that the premise is rat free. If evidence of rodent infestation is found, the property must be baited prior to demotion. • If this proposed development includes an existing individual onsite sewage management system(s), and the system(s) will be abandoned, it shall be abandoned in accordance with Fulton County regulations. • If this proposed development includes an existing individual onsite water supply system(s), and the system(s) will be abandoned, it shall be abandoned in accordance with Fulton County regulations. Fulton County Tax Assessor: Property Tax ID#: 22 -4770-0909-030-3 City of Milton Fire Marshal: Comments: • For the Hopewell private school-Possible increase in call volume for emergency services, water consumption demands will increase, traffic increase could slow response times, and access to the proposed building needs to be around the entire building and to allow parking between the building and right of way could pose a problem for emergency access. Public Safety • The public safety impact would be primarily traffic related, specifically during drop-off and pick-up times in the morning and afternoon. The projected enrollment of 325 students means up to 325 additional cars on Hopewell between 7:00 and 9:00 in the morning and 2:00 and 4:00 in the afternoon which may increase traffic congestion in the area. The school must have some means of managing parent-student traffic that does Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 19 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017 not result in traffic backing up and potentially blocking Hopewell Rd during these time periods. As a two lane road, the daily influx of these vehicles can adversely impact traffic in the area if the school has not developed a means of keeping the road clear of waiting parents before and after school. Potential traffic hazards include increased accidents, and restricted emergency vehicle access during these times due to the nature of the roads and traffic patterns on Hopewell Rd. Otherwise, the impact on public safety will be negligible. Prepared by the Community Development Department for the Planning Commission Meeting on January 29, 2007 1/24/2008 Page 20 of 20 U07-011/VC07-017