The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet - DRB - 05/04/2021 AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING Council Chambers May 4, 2021 6:00pm Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/95042441304?pwd=UEw0QWlpN290M3JUM3pBZWNwUTRRdz09 Meeting ID: 950 4244 1304 (No passcode needed) One tap mobile +13017158592,92883503526# US (Washington D.C) 1) Call to order / Pledge of allegiance. 2) Introduction of Board Members 3) Approval of Agenda 4) Approval of April meeting minutes 5) Demos a. 12905 New Providence Road Request(s): Demolish a house and remove six small sheds from the property. 6) Courtesy Reviews a. V21-09, 200 Tor Court Request(s): To allow the lot coverage for an CUP zoned property that fronts a public street to go from 20 percent to 25 percent. (Sec. 64-1141, (d) (1)(b)) b. V21-10, 12655 Birmingham Hwy (Starbucks signs) Request(s): To allow all wall signs to be made of transparent white lexan and vinyl. (Sec. 64-2325 (b)(4)) To allow internal illumination of all signs (Sec. 64-2325(b)(2)) To allow the 48” diameter sign to remain on the architectural feature. (Sec. 64-2325 (b)(3)) To allow an additional wall sign for a total of four signs. (Sec. 64-2325 (b)(6)) 7) Final reviews a. 2865 Webb Road Day care Architecture review b. 2865 Webb Road Day Care LDP review c. 12595 Crabapple Road Stone house architecture review 8) New Business a. 9) Old business a. 10) Adjournment ACTION REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING Council Chambers April 13, 2021 6:00pm Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/95042441304?pwd=UEw0QWlpN290M3JUM3pBZWNwUTRRdz09 Meeting ID: 950 4244 1304 (No passcode needed) One tap mobile +13017158592,92883503526# US (Washington D.C) 1) Call to order / Pledge of allegiance Members Present: Reid Casey, Laura Wysong, Beniquez Palmer, Lee Collins, Jeff Dufresne, and Charlie Roberts 2) Introduction of Board Members 3) Approval of Agenda Motion to Approve the agenda: Jeff Dufresne 2nd: Reid Casey Vote: 6-0 (Approved) 4) Approval of March meeting minutes Motion to Approved the meeting minutes: Reid Casey 2nd: Lee Collins Vote: 6-0 (Approved) 5) Demos a. 15245 Birmingham Hwy (Deferred from last month) Request(s): • To demo the house Motion to Approve: Reid Casey 2nd: Lee Collins Vote: 6-0 (Approved) b. 2865 Webb Road (Deferred from last month) Request(s): • To demo the house Motion to Approve: Beniquez Palmer 2nd: Reid Casey Vote: 6-0 (Approved) 6) Courtesy Reviews a. V21-08, 120 Dorris Road Request(s): To allow an accessory storage for tralerstructure to be constructed in the front yard. (Sec. 64-416 (i)) Comments: Recommends approval with a condition that DRB to approve the design prior to permitting the building. b. RZ21-07, 14140 Freemanville Road Request(s): To rezone from AG-1 to CUP (community Unit Plan) for 6 single family houses. Comments: Recommends denial. c. U 21-01/ VC21-03, U21-02, U 21-03/ VC21-04, 2105 Bethany Way Request(s): Three use permits. Comments: Recommends no further expansion of existing business. 7) Final reviews • 875 Mayfield Road, (LDP) Medical office Motion to Approve: Charlie 2nd: Beniquez Palmer Vote: 6-0 (Approved) 8) New Business a. 2865 Webb Road (Courtesy Review) Day Care Comments: Change roof color, use lighter bricks and change railing design and come back for the final review. 9) Old business a. 875 Mayfield Road, (Building and Architecture) Medical office Motion to Approve: Charlie 2nd: Beniquez Palmer Vote: 6-0 (Approved) Comments: Remove luvers, double the number of brackets , replace the vents by windows, cover the door. 10) Adjournment DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION MEETING DATE: ________________________________________________________________ TYPE OF REVIEW: FINAL _____ COURTESY _____ CASE # _________________________ PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: 12905 NEW PROVIDENCE DEMO PLAN PROJECT ADDRESS: 12905 New Providence Road Milton GA OVERLAY/FORM BASED CODE: ____________________________________________________ HAS LDP/BUILDING PERMIT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW? YES ____ NO X PROJECT TYPE (CHECK ONE): SITE/LANDSCAPE ___________ BUILDING ___________ SALES TRAILER _________ DEMOLITION ____X____ ZONING/USE PERMIT/VARIANCE ___________ OTHER (EXPLAIN) _________________________ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DEMO EXISTING ONE-STORY WOOD FRAME HOUSE AND REMOVED ALL EXISTING SHEDS BY TRAILER, APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE INFORMATION CONTACT PERSON NAME: TAYLOR GALLIMORE COMPANY: GREYDEN ENGINEERING LLC ADDRESS: 12460 CRABAPPLE ROAD, SUITE 202-374, ALPHARETTA, GEORGIA 30004 PHONE: 678-910-7169 FAX: _________________________________ EMAIL: tgallimore@greydenllc.com APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE: To the best of my knowledge, this application is correct and complete. I understand that I, or my representative should be in attendance at the Design Review Board meeting on ________________________, at 6:00pm, to present this project. To the best of my knowledge, I have met all applicable Overlay/Form Based Code conditions (Hwy 9/Deerfield, Birmingham, Crabapple, Rural Milton.) Applicant: __ __ Date 4/26/2021 AGENDA #: 5/4/2021 5/4/2021 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please see the list below for materials required according to the type of review. All site plans and building plans shall be drawn to scale. Mounted drawings and sample boards showing materials, colors, etc. may be brought to the meeting for your presentation. Please fold all large drawings down to 81/2 by 11 size and collate all materials. 11x17 ‘booklets’ are acceptable as well. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted for review. If you have any questions, please contact Cody Hendrix at 678 242 2513. SITE PLAN/LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW—9 sets Construction drawings, as required for LDP, including, but not limited to:  Site location map(atlas map)  Aerial map (Google)  Acreage, density, adjacent zonings  Zoning conditions (if any)  Building footprint, square footage  Grading, storm water plan, detention/retention areas  Location of streams, stream buffers  Roadways, parking areas, driveways, sidewalks, bike paths, pedestrian paths  Dumpster enclosure detain/ location  Landscape plan showing location, size and type of specimen and recompense trees, as well as other plantings  Site lighting with photometric drawings , lighting fixture details  Retaining wall(s) location and material details  Fencing location and detail(s)  Bike rack location and detail  Mail kiosk location and detail (If applicable) BUILDING REVIEW—9 sets  Site location map(atlas map)  Aerial map (Google)  Site plan  Colored renderings of all facades  Line drawings of all elevations with heights, and materials labled  Locations of roof top equipment, satellite dishes, antennas,vents,exhausts (as applicable)  Site line study showing that rooftop units are not visible from adjoining roads (if applicable)  Location, details of lighting fixtures  Dumpster enclosure details (If applicable)  Mail kiosk details (If applicable)  Sample board showing materials, colors, etc. (Bring to the meeting) SALES TRAILER—9 sets  Site location map(atlas map)  Aerial map (Google)  Site plan showing location of sales trailer, setbacks, parking, etc.  Landscape plan  Picture and/or construction details of trailer DEMOLITION REVIEW—9 sets  Site location map(atlas map)  Aerial map (Google)  Site plan, indicating structure(s) to be demolished and the location of specimen trees, erosion control, tree save fencing  Pictures of structure(s) to be demolished VARIANCE/USE PEMIT/REZONING—9 sets  Site location map(atlas map)  Aerial map (Google)  Acreage, density, existing site conditions  Conceptual site plan showing location of buildings, detention areas, streams/stream buffers, specimen trees, roads, parking, driveways, sidewalks, etc.  For commercial/multifamily/townhome uses: conceptual renderings of buildings, square footages  For sign variance: site line study showing view of signs from adjacent roads  For stream buffer variance: mitigation plan X X X X Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. HdtJ�E Of '7H �BCSf'C1U,4Cli! Ck LiFE EE�'v.�cCEZGrXA' AGENDA #: s MI..: % s e £STPiSL15HEB2IX3fi [� I DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION MEETING DATE: _ _--- i 4 1.21 TYPE OF REVIEW: FINAL COURTESY CASE # V PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: J U_ d] Irl PROJECT ADDRESS: D IDD j 0 K t .. OVERLAY/FORM BASED. CODE: HAS LDP/BUILDING PERMIT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW? YES NO PROJECT TYPE (CHECK ONE): PROJECT DESCRIPTION' SITE/LANDSCAPE BUILDING SALES TRAILER DEMOLITION ZON.INGIUSE PERMITNARIANCE OTHER (EXPLAIN) APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE . NFORMAVO CONTACT PERSON NAME; _wit -(reg I SV.e-e.; 114 COMPANY: Q aICOP, SME ADDRESS: 1 /)- 4- w.. PHONE: � �-- ��r - /Cad ,FAX: 770--3Vf-f77I` EMAIL: APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: To the best of my knowledge, this application is correct and complete. l.understand that 1, or my representative should be in attendance at the Design Review Board meeting on _ , at 6:00pm, to present this project. To the best of my knowledge; I have met all applicable OverlaYfform Based Code conditions (Hwy 91Deerfield, Birmingham. Crabapple; Rural Milton.) .Applicant: C_� Date 3 t 2:i Page is too large to OCR. 0$,1+286( 6815220 6:,00,1* 322/ 322/+286( 6KHHW 6KHHWV2I 6FDOH 'DWH '$7( '$7( 5(9,6,21 '$7( '$7( $ 176 )25,1)250$7,2121/< N S 322/(48,3 % / % / %/ %/ $5($&$/&8/$7,21 6,7(3/$1 727$//276) ,03(59,286727$/ (;,67,1*,03(59,2866) 3523322/$1'63$+6) 3523%($0:$//6) 35236721(&23,1*6) 35233(59,2863$9(5'(&.,1*6) 322/+286(6,'(:$/.66) 727$/64)725 (; :'$1':,5( )(1&( PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION 9,1</:,1'2: %5,&. $63+$/76+,1*/(6 %5,&. $63+$/76+,1*/(6 %5,&. $63+$/76+,1*/(6 %5,&. $63+$/76+,1*/(6 6KHHW 6KHHWV2I 6FDOH 'DWH '$7( '$7( 5(9,6,21 '$7( '$7( $ 176 )25,1)250$7,2121/< )5217(/(9$7,21 5($5(/(9$7,21 5,*+7(/(9$7,21 /()7(/(9$7,21 PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION 5() &29(5('3$7,2 [ 67$&.$%/(:'.,7&+(1(77( 6725$*( [ %$7+5220 [ :,1'2:6&+('8/( /$%(/6,=(7<3(48$17,7< :6,1*/( :6,1*/( [ [ &2/80121 ;;%5,&.72 %5,&.%$6(7<3 6KHHW 6KHHWV2I 6FDOH 'DWH '$7( '$7( 5(9,6,21 '$7( '$7( $ 176 )25,1)250$7,2121/< 727$/322/+286($5($ 64)7 )/2253/$1 &(,/,1* 522)3/$1 PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION MEETING DATE: TYPE OF REVIEW: FINAL COURTESY CASE PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME:'-C�k`nct PROJECT ADDRESS: 1�(0'� �?+t�+iw� �H� --&A OVERLAY/FORM BASED CGDE: HAS LDP/BUILDING PERMIT BEEN SLJBMITTED FOR REVIEW? YES NO PROJECT TYPE (CHECK ONE): SITE/LANDSCAPE BUILDING SALES TRAILER DEMOLITION-�- 20NINGfUSE PERMIT VARIANCE j `✓ OTHER (EXPLAINi ` _T^ AGENDA # PROJECT DESCRIPTION: APPLICANTIREPRFSENTATIVE INFORMATION --ONTACT PERSON NAME: ___iay�1�[►i� _ _ __ COMPANY:--!Vf PHONE: 40 LA FAX: _ EMAIL:—S►._L4►�'—.--- APPLICANTS SIGNATURE: To the be,t of my knowledge, this appfication is correct and complete, l understand that I or y representative should be in attendance of the Design Review Board meeting on _ at 6';i�i1)- r*i, to present this project. To the hest of my knowledge, i have mel alt applicable Overlay/Form Basect Code conditions (Hwy Deerfield. Birn-unghorn, Crcaoopple, Pura; Milton.) Applicant. Date 0000 View 1: from Birmingham Highway showing 30” diameter wall sign View 2: from Birmingham Highway sidewalk showing 2 signs 1. Wall sign of 30” diameter 2. Sign on door 24” diameter Visibility of the door sign is limited to sidewalk and the courtyard. View 3: from Birmingham Highway moving towards the traffic-circle View 4: from the circle at Heritage walk and Birmingham Highway This is a 48” diameter sign on the architectural feature of the building. Moving cars will likely only notice this sign than other small signs. View 3 and View 4 are showing the same sign. View 4: from the interior parking lot showing one 24” diameter sign. View 5: from the Heritage walk extension. View 6: from the Heritage walk extension and the rear entry. No signs are visible from this side of the road. Cup of Joe — Crabapple. LLC 12555 Birmingham Highway, Building 1, Suite 102 Milton, Georgia 30004 C$ Attn: Board of Zoning Appeals, City of Milton Dear Board Members, As a local resident of Milton, I would like to thank you for serving our community on the Board. i have lived in Milton for several years and have seen wonderful local coffee shops come and go as they have struggled to generate the revenue needed to meet the growing costs of operating a very slim margin coffee business. Yet, it is something that our residents and neighbors enjoy and want within the community. When we decided to open a Starbucks location in Milton, our hope was that a strong and trusted national brand when coupled with local ownership would provide the right mix for a sustainable local community coffee shop. However, that mix stili requires a broad awareness and visibility by customers to support the business, combined with the brand awareness of Starbucks. As you may be aware, we submitted our sign permit application, which was originally approved. It was subsequently pulled when we were made aware that the material and lighting of the signs did not meet the existing City of Milton guidelines. Unfortunately, neither our architect, nor the Starbucks corporate designers identified that the material of the signs was to be made of wood or other material which has the appearance of wood with external lighting. As a result, we made a significant investment in the existing signs. When we designed the signage for the coffee shop, we wanted it to be visible to customers yet discrete enough so as not appear out of place within the community. Even though the signs are not made of wood or similar material to look like wood, we do believe that they blend in well within the community feel that is also important to us. If we were to replace the existing signs with new signage with external illumination, it would result in a material financial burden, As you are likely aware, the costs of construction have increased significantly over the last year, which have already resulted in costs to build out the space that were much higher than expected. We have included several pictures that show the current signage, which we believe provides the necessary customer awareness yet is simple in its look and feel. We respectfully request that the Hoard approve a variance to allow us to utilize the existing backlist signs which are made of white lexan and vinyl. In addition, we request that we be permitted to retain two south facing signs, as one of those signs is underneath the existing decking and stairs and is not keenly visible due to the recessed foundation of the building, which was not in the original architectural renderings we were provided. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brian Simmons, owner HOME OF' AGENDA #. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION MEETING DATE: A� TYPE OF REVIEW: FINAL COURTESY CASE # PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: Wt -6 to PROJECT ADDRESS: 2$ 6 S- u, EL 1. .0 goatI a sa►rt OVERLAY/FORM BASEL] CODE: HAS LDP/BUILDING PERMIT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW? YES NO PROJECT TYPE (CHECK ONE): SITE/LANDSCAPE BUILDING SALES TRAILER DEMOLITION ZONING/USE PERMIT/VARIANCE OTHER (EXPLAIN) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE INFORMATION CONTACT PERSON NAME: _ �� W9z1 kt-%,e'— _ COMPANY: ADDRESS: PHONE: _ � _ �3 1 !3 A I _FAX: EMAIL: k APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: To the best of my knowledge, this application is correct and complete. l understand that !, or my representative should be in attendance at the Design Review Board meeting on _ , at 6:00pm, to present this project. To the best of my knowledge, I have met all applicable Overlay/Form Based Code conditions (Hwy 9/Deerfield, Birmingham, Crabapple, Rural Milton.) Applicant: Date C ■ "yRt", � a. as:� ./� !� � ` . ��ƒ. � � � �� • f 3 « ?7� �/� \\d�2. *& - �c.�� y:� >ze«w�z � � �, � : �». wy»«.` �� # �� \� � % tea: � $��.%�� _� \� - � � -� � � A�� » � �a \ �I� 2 � � � �� kf . � �� `« HOME OF' AGENDA #. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION MEETING DATE: TYPE OF REVIEW: FINAL COURTESY CASE # PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: Wt -6 to PROJECT ADDRESS: 2$ 6 S- u, EL 1. .0 goatI a sa►rt OVERLAY/FORM BASEL] CODE: HAS LDP/BUILDING PERMIT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW? YES NO PROJECT TYPE (CHECK ONE): SITE/LANDSCAPE BUILDING SALES TRAILER DEMOLITION ZONING/USE PERMIT/VARIANCE OTHER (EXPLAIN) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE INFORMATION CONTACT PERSON NAME: _ �� W9z1 kt-%,e'— _ COMPANY: ADDRESS: PHONE: _ � _ �3 1 !3 A I _FAX: EMAIL: k APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: To the best of my knowledge, this application is correct and complete. l understand that !, or my representative should be in attendance at the Design Review Board meeting on _ , at 6:00pm, to present this project. To the best of my knowledge, I have met all applicable Overlay/Form Based Code conditions (Hwy 9/Deerfield, Birmingham, Crabapple, Rural Milton.) Applicant: Date Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION MEETING DATE: ________________________________________________________________ TYPE OF REVIEW: FINAL _____ COURTESY _____ CASE # _________________________ PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME:____Crabapple Beer & Wine Market____________________________________ PROJECT ADDRESS: ____12595 Crabapple Road_____________________________ OVERLAY/FORM BASED CODE: ___Crabapple T4_______________________________ HAS LDP/BUILDING PERMIT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW? YES ____ NO______ PROJECT TYPE (CHECK ONE): SITE/LANDSCAPE __X_________ BUILDING __Reno_________ SALES TRAILER _________ DEMOLITION ________ ZONING/USE PERMIT/VARIANCE ___________ OTHER (EXPLAIN) _________________________ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: __Renovation of 1920’s house into beer & wine market___ ___________________________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE INFORMATION CONTACT PERSON NAME: ___Robert Forrest_______ COMPANY:___Crabapple Stone House LLC___________________________ ADDRESS: ___12595 Crabapple Road, Milton, GA 30004____________________ PHONE: ___404-514-8575___ FAX: _________________________________ EMAIL: _____rob@stonewalkco.com_________________________________________ APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE: To the best of my knowledge, this application is correct and complete. I understand that I, or my representative should be in attendance at the Design Review Board meeting on ________________________, at 6:00pm, to present this project. To the best of my knowledge, I have met all applicable Overlay/Form Based Code conditions (Hwy 9/Deerfield, Birmingham, Crabapple, Rural Milton.) Applicant: __ __ Date 4/27/21 AGENDA #: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please see the list below for materials required according to the type of review. All site plans and building plans shall be drawn to scale. Mounted drawings and sample boards showing materials, colors, etc. may be brought to the meeting for your presentation. Please fold all large drawings down to 8 ½” by 11” size, and collate all materials. 11x17 ‘booklets’ are acceptable as well. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted for review. If you have any questions, please contact Shubha Jangam at 678 242 2539. SITE PLAN/LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW—9 sets Construction drawings, as required for LDP, including, but not limited to:  Site location map(atlas map)  Aerial map (Google)  Acreage, density, adjacent zonings  Zoning conditions (if any)  Building footprint, square footage  Grading, storm water plan, detention/retention areas  Location of streams, stream buffers  Roadways, parking areas, driveways, sidewalks, bike paths, pedestrian paths  Dumpster enclosure detain/ location  Landscape plan showing location, size and type of specimen and recompense trees, as well as other plantings  Site lighting with photometric drawings , lighting fixture details  Retaining wall(s) location and material details  Fencing location and detail(s)  Bike rack location and detail  Mail kiosk location and detail (If applicable) BUILDING REVIEW—9 sets  Site location map(atlas map)  Aerial map (Google)  Site plan  Colored renderings of all facades  Line drawings of all elevations with heights, and materials labled  Locations of roof top equipment, satellite dishes, antennas,vents,exhausts (as applicable)  Site line study showing that rooftop units are not visible from adjoining roads (if applicable)  Location, details of lighting fixtures  Dumpster enclosure details (If applicable)  Mail kiosk details (If applicable)  Sample board showing materials, colors, etc. (Bring to the meeting) SALES TRAILER—9 sets  Site location map(atlas map)  Aerial map (Google)  Site plan showing location of sales trailer, setbacks, parking, etc.  Landscape plan  Picture and/or construction details of trailer DEMOLITION REVIEW—9 sets  Site location map(atlas map)  Aerial map (Google)  Site plan, indicating structure(s) to be demolished and the location of specimen trees, erosion control, tree save fencing  Pictures of structure(s) to be demolished VARIANCE/USE PEMIT/REZONING—9 sets  Site location map(atlas map)  Aerial map (Google)  Acreage, density, existing site conditions  Conceptual site plan showing location of buildings, detention areas, streams/stream buffers, specimen trees, roads, parking, driveways, sidewalks, etc.  For commercial/multifamily/townhome uses: conceptual renderings of buildings, square footages  For sign variance: site line study showing view of signs from adjacent roads  For stream buffer variance: mitigation plan spv B 010- 59349 � 70219 9• 309, PG. Q 92 143-148 PROJECT NORTH 0 8 32 FEET 4 16 LESS THAN 5,000 S.F. DISTURBED AREA u� Page is too large to OCR. Page is too large to OCR. CELL. ACCE "HtAP- aom COVERED PORCH 22-0 X 8-0 BAR II I SEATING NEW DECK (CUD)F-1 �uvtr, I w == g I g / \ O 1 I I PUB 45 PERSONS 1/8" = l' -o" 1,246 SF PROVIDE NFPA-13D SPRINKLER SYSTEM W/FDC WITHIN 100' OF HYDRANT w Custom colors available. Most colors can be matched accurately and require a color sample. Additional costs and lead-time may apply. Color matching is approximate and could incur additional per pound powder pricing and/or minimum purchase quantities. Colors shown are an approximate match. EVO DOORS STANDARD COLORS Satin Black Chestnut Bronze Bone White Sandstone Our doors are finished with Sherwin-Williams Powdura® 4000 powder coatings that are designed to provide substantial resistance to abrasion, impact, scuffing and scratching, while delivering a superb finish and long-term durability. Powdura 4000 is a proven technology that can withstand the elements – from UV rays to high heat and humidity – and meets or exceeds AAMA 2604 specifications, providing excellent gloss retention and weathering resistance. PERFORMANCE DATA AAMA Spec 2604 Film Thickness ASTM D7091 1.8 to 3.0 mil Gloss ASTM D523 Gloss > 30% retention GI-384069-CC 3/21Visit www.EVO-Doors.com or call (903) 408-6498 to learn more. EVO OFFERS SUNSCREENS AND BUG SCREENS AS AN ADD-ON Retractable Sunscreens: Renlita offers retractable screens for residential and commercial properties. Retractable Insect Screens: Enjoy a bug-free outdoor space. Black Tobacco White Bone Bug Screen FINISHED WITH POWDER COATINGS FROM SHERWIN-WILLIAMS The EVO series is made to be beautiful. With a max size of 12 feet wide and 8 feet tall and four color choices the EVO is perfect for all sorts of applications. MULTIPLE SIZES & COLORS Why make things difficult? The EVO is designed for easy installation and uses a typical electrical outlet to provide power. No need for hydraulics! EASY INSTALLATION With options like insect screens and sun shades that integrate right into the sleek touch screen, the EVO-VUE is the perfect way to open up any façade. SCREEN & SHADE INTEGRATION WWW.EVO-DOORS.COM903-408-6498 EVO -VUE SINGLE PANEL SWING OUT The EVO-VUE is a single panel swing out door system that can transform any space with the press of a button. Sturdy steel construction and simple installation makes this an ideal solution for those who want to elevate their design and create a unique and dynamic space. No hydraulic pumps, huge motors or specialty installers are needed here. EVO-DOORS were designed to be the most value packed door system on the market. Open your restaurant, business or patio with ease and keep comfortable without breaking the bank. Call us today or visit us online to discuss your options! BEST VALUE IN CUSTOM OPENINGS WWW.EVO-DOORS.COM FINISH OPTIONS With multiple standard color options and super durable powder coating, you can design your vision and know that it will last. If your project requires an expertly matched powder coat finish, we can do that. Just send us a sample and our team of powder manufacturers will create the perfect match. 1/4” tempered glass is perfect for mild enviromental conditions where temparture transfer is not a concern. GLASS OPTIONS MAX WIDTH 12 FEET SIZE OPTIONS 1” insulated clear tempered glass provides great insulation from the elements where it’s not exposed to direct sunlight. 1” insulated Low- E glass is the best option for protecting against thermal and solar energy transfer. STANDARD CUSTOM GOOD BETTER BEST MAX HEIGHT 8 FEET 903-408-6498 The 5” touchscreen brings all the features together in one, easy- to-use interface. The brushed aluminum faceplate fits perfectly into any interior design. TOUCHSCREEN CONTROL EVO -VUE SINGLE PANEL SWING OUT Show off your style with the iconic look of a swing out door without the huge price tag. With beauti- ful lines, clear views, and screen options to keep you comfortable, why would you ever compromise? WELCOME TO THE EVOLUTION Sample rollup doors across the street r .-' � ' � � ! � � ��. ,� , . :.f � `. "".y , �M`' aid � '�� ► .!'-r �!�! f � �.� �:,�{'� _- ri` r �'� i v� �� yam,•/' i'"�" ,� rS ti �f, i�9,. y ,qa ��;iy+V '' � "'t� r ,'r�. J �� 7I` xpf.-!Q: ; • . 'l.�� pi r �`'♦ - !a � •. ° � �: #.�� Y^ � t�1' �r� .{s.+l"� '6'"- `,�:A r r.. �x� �.��'�.� � "E�'h � fr`,er r r r � � ! � A r �yy raj ,r,� r� o � �i �,x .hd � cu � 'pv��'µ,�y.�lt �'� � p 8 �: �S' /� �.�' �e11�, x /� � y �r'{",r � !hi it � •!"T %�y'y ;"'� ��,g,, ' I�FM� I i1, 4�F ,,yi�.. ', Y �`^y A��p �ilr'� fir', !"';',�!� Jt ., � y 9' � 1 i�T" . - �M1!'i��,' . .:R"T". •! � °�'�� J °' ' �"'> ..tvx �'�i�,y �� r� �y�r A''-�.� � j��R *,p{. �eA� �!'��.+ ,I� '! }y'r�+' "M�`!" q;.� M�tYyel rsryR"3 ' i ,��, �',� c �-'A'n �-��in"0r A,- G# � i,5e"�^ �v ,� K� � �� .� �'� V '. r r � � r'�� ; � a s� ,yl+��, r1 .J �!s/i�,�� 7p"' ul► � ��dd9 �i��'.' �i' .r�!"i P ,.,+""'�+ �pi�• � ,�q*, k'�'�.n'r�' '. ` } � � �.� ,d' � ✓' #Ta"'' 0!'-� . �', �W�,�g � �',+.a p �` �i�'�^" r�-'�T i� Biu 1� +'•�'b K"dr �� 9;r i p �„ _ � . x � �" ! � � �M'�ffl'� r � ,,, �,kM'��.W"t� �',� � �- M'" ,� 3�r�,�.� r,;,.�''!� �'�"+ !T"�`- .,�! d y'�M1� ` �` .1, . —� [�,, �� I.� f�rN a�'��rrrfff � g ��gr+ ,lttr� � . ��y�r ��. -0��? ..�.�' � {•;: ' �„�! '.�t'��y '1!��f` �� ,r'r � �'° e� 4J 1,. y,�pl'� r��si"� ! ty.�"V �. .ti�M�'l�rA�' wl*��.r'�',,y•'� C� 7"yy�,��.a �i3 f'*� � y.� �q�,` �� .r�Nt�� Y7,F� i� `� .r� y�"✓"�y m,� � l;�!��,�.T��,r.� � , � 9,� �f. �� ' y � µr �. � f ,r� � �'' ��rt�' dl'�"�a+Y�ft�y�I,�✓�+^�,�+'7/'?''t"��+ry^�.�'.J��I� �I�r'�'�' ] �? �� '�A�af7' l'P��f'�I' x /r' V A�'f �'" �t+�'��+r1�� ✓' � "�� ".�� ' GaP:a' R��. M1;; � '�' ;%,+ � q,,�,'y .�rc� ��t.r4 �'`�,� - � G r � ,paxlr f tq�r�,>7'r � �N f�'1 alit �,,/,.e ,� � = �: �,.. � � rr iIN � r.,,xK - ' Hca' ,� ' •"` s,, ,, lns�i .J%xif +�.rW, . - yam,_ '��"'!'�'��'•� �. rhy a —ray ,r ,�� ' , [S'3 S _ 'I h, �' �j1 I 1 cr � � ,..A ... rc ��.�. �° �,.>!.'"' � �"� r,.��• � it ..a �. A r Y.'viY'��'f 9�'JVi. �...� i, a' -x'Sr Imo+.. -] -- .'. a � -` 1� ' t � i.`�' �� o"tr'�-S �� .'2 � x4'.:4_ ir'i.9 t'�' .�r:M��}. 1 'J.� M 7!�J ��f. LLY. ,c`A.C. #l�{P gni. �'�:� .Jr �tt. A t � h1i � _ °�-•-"�k'�s' �; "dna t� '� - - w � +i f'C'.¢ _ � � r# Qi_ � "i� 4"T�e '19f!' sy ^o�c �„ r � -' � ►�_ ;'.r. � . 1,.� `�„--;{ . � � :. ,' - ..- -' .,.. �- � � 4. ' ' �' /�� 1" i J�, _ � t1 - .. -.;q� �' .. ./ f y , _. �. .�' L'" r , J x '�. A,sf y', � � , f ,,:,ate � eJ� ,". N. �: y.+/ f _- � "-rte_ �, �'. .. - 'r , -- ,.+y ..re - Q � ,3, .»�, � .. �+' .. q.�, �'' *i'f . � 1.. ._-.amu*--, «t 1�� r� !7L�i., y . _ r. I �!.-` ,��F Axa .f_ t�$ _ � a�� 1� �r`+2' 4��'i� � !r:,,. - y ;�;; �� .�� , . -� � 1 ��: t. �. �+ � �; j: r�' p !� .,i�d