HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - BZA - 01-20-2009
MINUTES
City of Milton Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009 7:00 PM
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Sandy Jones
Todd Chernik
Gary Willis
Scott Kilgore
Marcia Parsons
Walt Rekuc
John McRae
CITY STAFF Angela Rambeau, Community Development
AGENDA
1. Call to order and pledge
2. Introduction of Board members
3. Approval of December meeting minutes
4. V08-022
2985 Manor Bridge Drive, Elliott Smith for Anthony Pergola (The Manor)
5. V08-039
16880 Quayside Drive, Richard Wernick (Kingsley Estates)
ADMINISTRATIVELY MOVED TO FEBRUARY AGENDA
6. Other business
7. Adjournment
CALL TO ORDER Chair Sandy Jones called meeting to order.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
BOARD INTRODUCTIONS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Sandy Jones made a motion to approve the December 16, 2008 meeting minutes
with the inclusion of the changes of Todd Chernik and Walt Rekuc. The motion was
seconded by Todd Chernik. There was no discussion. Vote: 6-0-1, with Scott
Kilgore abstaining stating he had not reviewed the minutes. The motion carried.
STATEMENT OF THE BYLAWS OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEAL
Read by the Chair Sandy Jones.
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009
Page 2
Chair Sandy Jones
Requested Staff read the first agenda item, V08-022.
Staff Angela Rambeau
Presented Variance V08-022, 2985 Manor Bridge Drive, Elliott Smith for
Anthony Pergola
To allow a 16 ft. by 14 ft. accessory structure (a storage shed) to encroach into
the rear yard setback (Article 5.1.3.I)
Shed is 3.7 ft. from the rear property line
Location would be behind the sewer pump station
Focus meeting was held on August 7, 2008.
Read statements from the meeting to the Board members
Read standards for consideration
Staff's Recommended Conditions: (1) Applicant shall obtain a building permit
and pay all applicable penalty fees for building a structure without a permit.
Chair Sandy Jones
Called for questions from Board members to Staff
Requested applicant come forward to present case.
Elliott B. Smith, 4460 Wykeshire Court, Cumming, GA 30004
Attorney representing applicant, Anthony Pergola
Presented history of property to the Board
Mr. Pergola construction home on Lot #9 of The Manor Subdivision
Purchased part of common area in August of 2007 from the developer
At that time was not a conforming lot of record
Property was quitclaimed to Mr. Pergola
There were some promises by developer to do things to make lot conforming
One of those things was to revise the final plat for the subdivision which was
not done
Submitted copy of letter from the developer of The Manor to Staff to present
to the Board
When shed was built Mr. Pergola did not realize there was building setback
for that portion of the common area
City cited Mr. Pergola and was advised would have to apply for a variance
Met with city planners
Were told need a Lot #9 plat revision to be in conformity
Submitted a final plat to Staff to present to Board
Submitted a letter from EMC Engineering to Staff to present to Board
regarding the emergency spillway
Property has certain easements on it related to the pump station and the
spillway
Shed location is outside of those easements and outside of the flood plain
Do not believe any harm would be caused to public to allow shed to remain in
its current location
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009
Page 3
Walt Rekuc
Discussion with applicant regarding plat
Asked how close shed was to the property line
Any discussion with adjoining neighbors
Landscaping to minimize impact?
Elliott B. Smith
Referenced EMC Engineering letter
3.7 ft. from the rear property line
Have not heard from any of the neighbors
There are significant plantings around line of the shed
John McRae
Question about how close rear neighbors are to the shed
Have those neighbors been contacted about the shed?
Elliott B. Smith
Stated he did not have exact distance
Appears to be a good distance from adjoining neighbors
Applicant Anthony Pergola, 2485 Manor Bridge Drive, Milton, GA
Have a letter from the neighbor residing at 2975 Manor Bridge Drive stating
he had no objection to the shed and could provide that letter
Neighbor was very happy with the improvements that had been made to the
property
Stated the only person that could have a visual to back of the shed would be
the neighbor behind him residing on Hamby Road
Distance from shed to their property would be approximately 100 yards
There are a lot of trees between the two
All permits were applied for and received by the builder
Todd Chernik
Questioned applicants about color of shed from photos the Board were
provided
Asked if there were plans to make the shed all one color and blend in
Applicant Anthony Pergola
Plans are to use cedar shakes make it all natural in color
Marcia Parsons
Question about location of shed on property
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009
Page 4
Applicant Anthony Pergola
Only flat area on the property
Developer stated had to maintain the property
Needed equipment to maintain the property
Need a structure to keep equipment in
Decided to build a nice structure instead of putting a prefab shed on the
property that would not blend in
Did not know was doing anything wrong
Elliott B. Smith
Discussed with Board the 10 ft. sewer easement that would not allow a
structure to be built in that location
Chair Sandy Jones
Asked applicant the purpose for the shed
Storage, woodworking shop?
Applicant Anthony Pergola
Shed strictly for storage of equipment
Currently has a lawnmower in it
Has no lights or electric
Chair Sandy Jones
Called for public comment
Roland Ebright, 15745 Hamby Road, Milton, GA
Neighbor directly behind Mr. Pergola's house
Spoke in opposition
Knew about setbacks because he was planning to build another house himself
on his property
Concern was primarily due to it being so close to his property line
He called code enforcement to inquire about setback rules as pertains to The
Manor
There is no landscaping behind the building at all
Shed is very visible
Cannot see the lake and the park, but can now only see the building
Have no objection to having the building but believes should comply with the
guidelines
Disagreed with the flat area to construct the shed
Batting cage was put in on a flat area
Stated his house is about 80 feet from the property line, not 100 yards
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009
Page 5
Walt Rekuc
Asked Mr. Ebright if building was left at current location, but plantings were
done on his side to screen it, would he be amenable to that
Roland Ebright
Stated he would be in agreement with the screening
Shed is already there now so too late to do anything about it
Need some fast growing plantings
Marcia Parsons
Discussion with Mr. Ebright about the planting of trees and the obstruction of
view of lake
Roland Ebright
Deed has already been done
Do not believe Board is going to make applicant tear shed down
Will just have to live with it
Do not want any more buildings going up
John McRae
Asked Mr. Ebright if he had knowledge of other neighbors that may similarly
be affected
If matter was deferred could this be resolved between the two of you?
Roland Ebright
Stated no
He owns 14 acres and there is nobody on either side of it
Concern about other people wanting to build and getting close to his property
line
Stated he believed it could be resolved and that he was easy to get along with
Could work well with the city's arborist
Chair Sandy Jones
Called for additional questions
Advised Mr. Ebright that precedence was not a basis for any forward work he
may be planning on performing in the future
Applicant Anthony Pergola
His entire property is bordered with very expensive large trees
Planned on running those trees all away across but ran out of money
This is still in the plans to do
Do like the privacy so will do what Board requires
Had to put the fence up that was required by The Manor
Would work with Arborist and landscapers to decide if room and where to
plant
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009
Page 6
Chair Sandy Jones
Called for additional questions
There were none
Closed public hearing
Stated floor was open for a motion
Motion and Second: Walt Rekuc made a motion to approve V08-022 for the shed
to remain due to the applicant being unaware of and not being shown on the plan
were the building setback was and therefore made an error in placement of that
building. Also applicant was unaware of the rear building setback as shown on the
other lots and to also keep in harmony with the neighborhood to allow the shed to
stay in its place and to have the following conditions: (1) The applicant shall obtain a
building permit and pay all applicable fees for the building that was built without a
permit; and (2) To work with the City Arborist to plant 5, 6 feet tall trees with
staggered spacing behind the shed on Mr. Ebright's property, and those plantings
should be of the type that will have their leaves year round. The motion was
seconded by Sandy Jones.
Discussion:
Chair Sandy Jones
Do not believe it is in their scope to determine the exact number of plantings.
Can state Board would like something to be evergreen to provide screening for
the back property owner
Should leave planting decisions up to the expertise of the City Arborist
Have confidence in arborist's decision
Walt Rekuc
Did not want to leave it so much up to the Arborist that he is given a blank
check as far as cost for the screening
Preferred to give some defined limit of plants
Not stating how or where to plant
Would like to state there will be at least 5, 6 feet tall trees
Have done a good deal of screening in his career
Believes in his opinion this will provide sufficient screening
Trying to find the quickest, easiest and most cost efficient way to screen
Marcia Parsons
Would like to suggest a friendly amendment to the motion
Stating a minimum of 5, subject to the approval of the city arborist
Additional Board Discussion about number of trees for screening
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009
Page 7
Scott Kilgore
Moved to amend that the language in the motion specifying number of
plantings be struck from the motion and that the decision be left to the city
arborist. There was no second. The motion failed.
There was no further discussion on the original motion to approve. Vote: 4-3, with
Walt Rekuc, Gary Willis, Todd Chernik and Scott Kilgore voting for the motion to
approve and Sandy Jones, John McRae and Marcia Parsons voting in opposition to
the motion. The motion carried.
Chair Sandy Jones
Requested Staff read the next agenda item, V08-031, 16355 Birmingham
Highway, Milton, GA
Staff Angela Rambeau
Staff requested that V08-031 be deferred for thirty (30) days on behalf of the
applicant
Applicant is in process of getting both of the property owners to sign off on his
proposal that he presented them on December 24th
Applicant has one signature and needs one more
Motion and Second: Walt Rekuc moved to defer V08-031 for thirty (30) days.
the motion was seconded by Gary Willis.
Todd Chernik
Staff should send a message back to the applicant that Board expects a
resolution by the next meeting or the case would need to be heard and
resolved so it does not carry on
Stated in his opinion he did not believe it is a good use of the city's time
Gary Willis
Stated he did not believe the Board had the right to tell a citizen when they
can come back before the Board
It is the applicant that is asking for the variance, not us
Chair Sandy Jones
Called for a vote on the motion
There was no other discussion. Vote: 7-0. The motion unanimously carried to defer
V08-031 for thirty (30) days.
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009
Page 8
Chair Sandy Jones
Requested Staff read the next agenda item, V08-039, V08-039, 16880
Quayside Drive, Richard Wernick (Kingsley Estates)
Staff Angela Rambeau
Stated that Staff had moved this item to the February agenda
Did not see the required materials in time to be placed on this agenda
Motion and Second: Walt Rekuc made a motion to defer V08-039 to the Board's
next meeting in February, 2009. The motion was seconded by Sandy Jones.
Discussion:
Todd Chernik
Requested that Staff provide the Board with a picture or plan they can review
prior to the next meeting
Staff Angela Rambeau
Stated they would be provided with pictures and dimensions and any other
relevant information
There was no further discussion. Vote: 7-0. The motion unanimously carried to
defer V08-039.
Chair Sandy Jones
Called for any new or old business
Staff Angela Rambeau
Advised Board that it was the first of the year and time to elect new officers
Asked if there were any nominations for 2009 Vice Chair
John McRae
Can current Chair and Vice Chair serve another term?
Staff Angela Rambeau
Stated they could be reelected
No time limit
John McRae
Nominated Todd Chernik for resumption of his vice chairmanship
Nomination was seconded by Scott Kilgore
Discussion
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009
Page 9
Walt Rekuc
Inquired as to why they were calling for nominations for Vice Chair before the
Chair
Thought procedures should be discussed prior to taking action
Gary Willis
Asked Mr. Kilgore to rescind his motion so they could start over
Scott Kilgore
Rescinded his motion
Gary Willis
Nominated Sandy Jones for Chair
Scott Kilgore seconded the nomination
There was no discussion. Vote: 7-0. The vote was unanimous.
Staff Angela Rambeau
Stated by unanimous vote, Sandy Jones was reelected for 2009 as the Chair of
the Board of Zoning Appeals.
Chair Sandy Jones
Called for nominations for the Vice Chair
John McRae
Nominated Todd Chernik for the Vice Chair
Nomination for Todd Chernik as Vice Chair was seconded by Marcia Parsons
Discussion:
Walt Rekuc
Nominated himself for Vice Chair
Marcia Parsons seconded the nomination for Walt Rekuc as Vice Chair
Discussion:
Walt Rekuc
Stated his reasons for his nomination of himself as Vice Chair
There was no further discussion
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009
Page 10
Vote for Todd Chernik as Vice Chair: 6-1, with Walt Rekuc voting in opposition.
Todd Chernik was elected as the Vice Chair of the Board of Zoning Appeals for 2009
Chair Sandy Jones
Stated the only other business was that tomorrow evening the Board's
proposed recommendations to their variance considerations would be
presented to City Council
Planning Commission had been copied as they review the proposed changes
due to the fact these were changes to the Zoning Ordinance
There were no comments back from the Planning Commission she was aware
of as of today
Both versions will be presented to City Council.
The first was the December meeting version with comments from the
Planning Commission
One change was that harmony was put back in and the 10% for the maximum
number of lots was removed
The other is the document is the one that the BZA developed that Staff would
be recommending
Council does have the right to modify any changes and come back with
questions
Chair stated she would be at the Council meeting to address any questions
Todd Chernik
Asked if they had endorsement from Staff as well as from the City Attorney on
the Board's proposed document
Chair Sandy Jones
Stated that was correct
Todd Chernik
Asked if it would be appropriate to individually reach out to their Council
representative
Chair Sandy Jones
Stated that would be appropriate and that she had done so herself
She gave her Council representative an update and explained there were two
documents that will come before them to avoid confusion
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20, 2009
Page 11
Chair Sandy Jones
Asked Staff if their changes that were made to the By-laws to enforce time
requirements, could they get those updated By-law changes?
Staff Angela Rambeau
Stated she would provide them with the changed By-laws
Chair Sandy Jones
Asked Staff if Council approves the Board's recommended changes for the
primary variance considerations, how would that get incorporated into their
By-laws?
Would the Board have to formally vote the new By-law changes to be added?
Staff Angela Rambeau
February variances heard would still be under old By-laws
March would be under new document
Would have to have a motion and vote to change the By-laws
Chair Sandy Jones
Called for any other business
There was none
ADJOURNMENT
Motion and Second: Sandy Jones made a motion to adjourn the Board of Zoning
Appeals meeting. The motion was seconded by Marcia Parsons. There was no
discussion. Vote: 7-0. Motion unanimously carried.
Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Date Approved: _______________
Approved By:
____________________________ _________________________
Francesca Ivie Sandy Jones, Chair
City Clerk’s Office Board of Zoning Appeals
City of Milton Board Zoning Appeals
Minutes Regular Meeting
January 20,2009
Page 11
Chair Sandy Jones
•Asked Staff if their changes that were made to the By-laws to enforce time
requirements,could they get those updated By-law changes?
Staff Angela Rambeau
•Stated she would provide them with the changed By-laws
Chair Sandy Jones
•Asked Staff if Council approves the Board's recommended changes for the
primary variance considerations,how would that get incorporated into their
8y-la\\'"5?
•Would the Board have to formally vote the new By-law changes to be added?
Staff Angela Rambeau
•February variances heard would still be under old By-laws
•March would be under new document
•Would have to have a motion and vote to change the By-laws
Chair Sandy Jones
•Called for any other business
•There was none
ADJOURNMENT
Motion and Second:Sandy Jones made a motion to adjourn the Board of Zoning
Appeals meeting.The motion "'as seconded by Marcia Parsons.There was no
discussion.Vote:7-0.Motion unanimously carried.
Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Date Approved:__2""j;,-,a'-"Cl-A,-,()~f _
Approv y:
L:;:::=~F~I:::'a ~eios"ca"'lV1':'~e~~~=:!:~':::'-:f._
City Clerk's Office
SandyJ
Board 0
e Chair
ing Appeals